MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389368632 · doi:10.1212/wnl.98.18_supplement.1373

Real-world Comparative Effectiveness and Persistence of Cladribine Tablets and Other Oral Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis from GLIMPSE: Results from the MSBase Registry (P12-4.003)

2022· article· en· W4389368632 sur OpenAlexaff
Helmut Butzkueven, Tim Spelman, Serkan Özakbaş, Raed Alroughani, Murat Terzi, Suzanne Hodgkinson, Guy Laureys, Tomáš Kalinčík, Anneke van der Walt, Bassem Yamout, Jeannette Lechner‐Scott, Aysun Soysal, Jens Kühle, José Luis Sánchez-Menoyo, Yolanda Blanco Morgado, Daniele Spitaleri, Vincent Van Pesch, Dana Horáková, Radek Ampapa, Francesco Patti, Richard Macdonell, Abdullah Al‐Asmi, Oliver Gerlach, Jiwon Oh, Ayşe Altıntaş, Namita Tundia, Schiffon Wong

Notice bibliographique

RevueNeurology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCladribineMultiple sclerosisMedicinePersistence (discontinuity)DiseaseDermatologyInternal medicineImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objective: Compare treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients newly treated with cladribine tablets (CladT) versus fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and teriflunomide in real world. Background: There are no clinical trials or real-world studies comparing effectiveness of CladT to other oral disease modifying therapies (DMT). The MSBase registry records demographics, DMT, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and relapses in over 74000 MS patients globally. Design/Methods: We described baseline demographics and outcomes for all adult (>18 years old) relapsing MS patients newly initiating CladT or oral comparators starting from January 2018 in MSBase registry. Propensity-score matching (PSM, 1:1) for three pairwise comparisons (CladT versus oral DMTs) included age, sex, EDSS, pre-baseline relapses, prior DMT initiation, and country. Outcomes included time-to-discontinuation (for CladT, switch to alternate DMT), annualised relapse rate (ARR) and time-to-first relapse. Time-to event analyses used marginal Cox models with Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% Confidence intervals (CI). ARRs were compared with a weighted negative binomial model with a cluster term for matched patient sets. Results: With PSM, cohorts were found well balanced on demographic and clinical characteristics. Median follow-up times were between 11–13 months. In the CladT versus fingolimod analysis (n=520/group), ARR was 0.09 vs 0.15 (p=0.02), HR for time-to-first relapse was 0.60 (0.41–0.88, p=0.01) and HR for time-to-discontinuation was 0.22 (0.14–0.34, p<0.001). For CladT vs DMF (n=450/group), ARR was 0.10 vs 0.15, p=0.03, HR for time-to-first relapse was 0.58 (0.37–0.90, p=0.02) and HR for time-to-discontinuation was 0.10 (0.06–0.17, p<0.001). For CladT vs teriflunomide (n=458/group), ARR was 0.09 vs 0.17, p<0.001, HR for time-to-first relapse was 0.33 (0.21–0.52, p<0.001) and HR for time-to-discontinuation was 0.10 (0.06–0.17, p<0.001). Conclusions: For all three pairwise comparisons, relapse and discontinuation outcomes significantly favoured CladT over other oral DMTs. Future analyses with longer follow-up comparing disability progression events are warranted. Disclosure: Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Oxford Health Policy Forum. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an officer or member of the Board of Directors for MSBase . The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received research support from NHMRC. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received research support from Biogen. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received research support from Roche. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received research support from Novartis. Timothy Spelman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Ozakbas has nothing to disclose. Dr. Alroughani has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen, Bayer, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Sanofi. Dr. Alroughani has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Bayer, Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Sanofi. Dr. Terzi has nothing to disclose. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from MERCK. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from Atara. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from Biogen . The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from Genzyme. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from ROCHE. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from Novartis. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Celgene. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi Genzyme. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for National Health and Medical Research Council. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for MS Research Australia. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi Genzyme. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Janssen. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Bristol Myers Squibb. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for WebMD Global. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Sanofi Genzyme. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Teva. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for BioCSL. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Merck. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Eisai. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Biogen. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Novartis. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Genzyme. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Roche. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Celgene. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Merck. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from MSBase Foundation. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from ARSEP and EDMUS Foundations. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from MS Research Australia. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from National Health and Medical Research Council. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Australian Research Council. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from MS Society. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Trish Foundation. Tomas Kalincik has a non-compensated relationship as a scientific leadership group chair with MSBase Foundation that is relevant to AAN interests or activities. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alexion. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen. The institution of Dr. Van Der Walt has received research support from NHMRC Australia. The institution of Dr. Van Der Walt has received research support from MSRA. The institution of Dr. Van Der Walt has received research support from Roche. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Janssen. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for elsevier. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received research support from Merck. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received research support from Biogen. Dr. Soysal has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kuhle has nothing to disclose. Dr. Blanco Morgado has nothing to disclose. Daniele Litterio A. Spitaleri has received research support from Novartis. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Celgene. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. The institution of Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received research support from Biogen. Dana Horakova has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dana Horakova has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dana Horakova has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dana Horakova has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Dr. Ampapa has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Ampapa has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Dr. Ampapa has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi-Genzym. Dr. Patti has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, TEVA. Dr. Patti has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an officer or member of the Board of Directors for University of Catania and AISM/FISM, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla. Dr. Macdonell has nothing to disclose. Oliver Gerlach has nothing to disclose. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. The institution of Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen-Idec. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD-Serono. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi-Genzyme. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Alexion. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen-Idec. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi-Genzyme. The institution of Dr. Oh has received research support from Biogen-Idec. The institution of Dr. Oh has received research support from EMD-Serono. The institution of Dr. Oh has received research support from Biogen-Idec. Dr. Altintas has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck . Dr. Altintas has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Deva. The institution of Dr. Altintas has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alexion. Mrs. Tundia has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of EMD Serono. Schiffon Wong has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of EMD Serono.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,048

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,004
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,107
Tête enseignante GPT0,324
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueNeurologyMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207