MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-world Comparative Effectiveness and Persistence of Cladribine Tablets and Other Oral Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis from GLIMPSE: Results from the MSBase Registry (P12-4.003)

2022· article· en· W4389368632 on OpenAlexaff
Helmut Butzkueven, Tim Spelman, Serkan Özakbaş, Raed Alroughani, Murat Terzi, Suzanne Hodgkinson, Guy Laureys, Tomáš Kalinčík, Anneke van der Walt, Bassem Yamout, Jeannette Lechner‐Scott, Aysun Soysal, Jens Kühle, José Luis Sánchez-Menoyo, Yolanda Blanco Morgado, Daniele Spitaleri, Vincent Van Pesch, Dana Horáková, Radek Ampapa, Francesco Patti, Richard Macdonell, Abdullah Al‐Asmi, Oliver Gerlach, Jiwon Oh, Ayşe Altıntaş, Namita Tundia, Schiffon Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCladribineMultiple sclerosisMedicinePersistence (discontinuity)DiseaseDermatologyInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Compare treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients newly treated with cladribine tablets (CladT) versus fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and teriflunomide in real world. Background: There are no clinical trials or real-world studies comparing effectiveness of CladT to other oral disease modifying therapies (DMT). The MSBase registry records demographics, DMT, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and relapses in over 74000 MS patients globally. Design/Methods: We described baseline demographics and outcomes for all adult (>18 years old) relapsing MS patients newly initiating CladT or oral comparators starting from January 2018 in MSBase registry. Propensity-score matching (PSM, 1:1) for three pairwise comparisons (CladT versus oral DMTs) included age, sex, EDSS, pre-baseline relapses, prior DMT initiation, and country. Outcomes included time-to-discontinuation (for CladT, switch to alternate DMT), annualised relapse rate (ARR) and time-to-first relapse. Time-to event analyses used marginal Cox models with Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% Confidence intervals (CI). ARRs were compared with a weighted negative binomial model with a cluster term for matched patient sets. Results: With PSM, cohorts were found well balanced on demographic and clinical characteristics. Median follow-up times were between 11–13 months. In the CladT versus fingolimod analysis (n=520/group), ARR was 0.09 vs 0.15 (p=0.02), HR for time-to-first relapse was 0.60 (0.41–0.88, p=0.01) and HR for time-to-discontinuation was 0.22 (0.14–0.34, p<0.001). For CladT vs DMF (n=450/group), ARR was 0.10 vs 0.15, p=0.03, HR for time-to-first relapse was 0.58 (0.37–0.90, p=0.02) and HR for time-to-discontinuation was 0.10 (0.06–0.17, p<0.001). For CladT vs teriflunomide (n=458/group), ARR was 0.09 vs 0.17, p<0.001, HR for time-to-first relapse was 0.33 (0.21–0.52, p<0.001) and HR for time-to-discontinuation was 0.10 (0.06–0.17, p<0.001). Conclusions: For all three pairwise comparisons, relapse and discontinuation outcomes significantly favoured CladT over other oral DMTs. Future analyses with longer follow-up comparing disability progression events are warranted. Disclosure: Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Oxford Health Policy Forum. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Dr. Butzkueven has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an officer or member of the Board of Directors for MSBase . The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received research support from NHMRC. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received research support from Biogen. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received research support from Roche. The institution of Dr. Butzkueven has received research support from Novartis. Timothy Spelman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Ozakbas has nothing to disclose. Dr. Alroughani has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen, Bayer, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Sanofi. Dr. Alroughani has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Bayer, Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Sanofi. Dr. Terzi has nothing to disclose. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from MERCK. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from Atara. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from Biogen . The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from Genzyme. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from ROCHE. The institution of Dr. Hodgkinson has received research support from Novartis. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. The institution of Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Celgene. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. Dr. Laureys has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi Genzyme. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for National Health and Medical Research Council. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for MS Research Australia. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi Genzyme. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Janssen. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Bristol Myers Squibb. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for WebMD Global. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Sanofi Genzyme. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Teva. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for BioCSL. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Merck. Tomas Kalincik has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Eisai. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Biogen. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Novartis. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Genzyme. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Roche. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Celgene. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Merck. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from MSBase Foundation. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from ARSEP and EDMUS Foundations. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from MS Research Australia. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from National Health and Medical Research Council. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Australian Research Council. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from MS Society. The institution of Tomas Kalincik has received research support from Trish Foundation. Tomas Kalincik has a non-compensated relationship as a scientific leadership group chair with MSBase Foundation that is relevant to AAN interests or activities. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alexion. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. Dr. Van Der Walt has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen. The institution of Dr. Van Der Walt has received research support from NHMRC Australia. The institution of Dr. Van Der Walt has received research support from MSRA. The institution of Dr. Van Der Walt has received research support from Roche. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dr. Yamout has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Janssen. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for elsevier. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received research support from Merck. The institution of Prof. Lechner-Scott has received research support from Biogen. Dr. Soysal has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kuhle has nothing to disclose. Dr. Blanco Morgado has nothing to disclose. Daniele Litterio A. Spitaleri has received research support from Novartis. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Celgene. Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. The institution of Vincent Van Pesch, MD, PhD has received research support from Biogen. Dana Horakova has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dana Horakova has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dana Horakova has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dana Horakova has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Dr. Ampapa has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Ampapa has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Dr. Ampapa has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi-Genzym. Dr. Patti has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, TEVA. Dr. Patti has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an officer or member of the Board of Directors for University of Catania and AISM/FISM, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla. Dr. Macdonell has nothing to disclose. Oliver Gerlach has nothing to disclose. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. The institution of Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen-Idec. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD-Serono. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi-Genzyme. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Alexion. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen-Idec. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi-Genzyme. The institution of Dr. Oh has received research support from Biogen-Idec. The institution of Dr. Oh has received research support from EMD-Serono. The institution of Dr. Oh has received research support from Biogen-Idec. Dr. Altintas has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck . Dr. Altintas has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Deva. The institution of Dr. Altintas has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alexion. Mrs. Tundia has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of EMD Serono. Schiffon Wong has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of EMD Serono.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207