MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389745521 · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000000698

FDA grants approval to the RSV vaccine (nirsevimab-alip) for all infants: a leap forward for shielding the smallest

2023· editorial· en· W4389745521 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abubakar Nazir, Rida Fatima, Awais Nazir

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Surgery · 2023
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRespiratory viral infections research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineRespiratory tract infectionsRespiratory tractPediatricsRespiratory systemLower respiratory tract infectionPalivizumabDiseaseVirusPathogenIntensive care medicineImmunologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Highlights Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a ubiquitous pathogen that affects the respiratory tract, primarily targeting infants, young children, and the elderly. It is one of the leading causes of severe lower respiratory tract infections in infants. Recently, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the RSV injection for all infants. The approval of Beyfortus relied partly on data obtained from the phase 3 MELODY trial. It is found that a single injection of nirsevimab administered before the RSV season protected healthy late-preterm and term infants from medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a ubiquitous pathogen that affects the respiratory tract, primarily targeting infants, young children, and the elderly. It is one of the leading causes of severe lower respiratory tract infections in infants and can pose significant health risks, especially to premature babies and those with underlying health conditions. RSV is highly contagious and spreads through respiratory droplets, making it a major concern for healthcare1. RSV has long been a cause of concern for parents and caregivers due to its potential to lead to severe respiratory illness in infants. In the United States, approximately 80 000 children under the age of 5 are hospitalized each year due to RSV infection. While most cases are mild, infants under 6 months, premature infants, and children with weakened immune systems or neuromuscular disorders are particularly susceptible to severe illness, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1. Previously, there were no licensed vaccines specifically for RSV available for routine use in children1. However, a ray of hope has emerged in the realm of pediatric healthcare with the recent approval of the RSV injection by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for all infants. The monoclonal antibody Beyfortus (nirsevimab-alip), which has already received approval for use in Europe and Canada, is intended for administration to newborns and infants who are either born during or entering their first RSV season. Additionally, it is recommended for children up to 24 months old who face a heightened risk of severe RSV infection during their second RSV season2. The approval of Beyfortus relied partly on data obtained from the phase 3 MELODY trial2. The trial demonstrated that the injection led to a 74.9% reduction in medically attended lower respiratory tract infections related to RSV compared to the placebo group [with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 50.6–87.3; P<0.001]3. A total of 1490 infants were included in the study, with 994 infants assigned to the nirsevimab group and 496 infants to the placebo group. Medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection was observed in 12 infants (1.2%) in the nirsevimab group and 25 infants (5.0%) in the placebo group. This indicates that nirsevimab demonstrated an efficacy of 74.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 49.6–87.1; P<0.001] in preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection3. Regarding hospitalization due to RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection, 6 infants (0.6%) in the nirsevimab group and 8 infants (1.6%) in the placebo group required hospitalization. The efficacy of nirsevimab in reducing hospitalizations was estimated at 62.1% (95% CI, −8.6 to 86.8; P=0.07). Thus, it was found that a single injection of nirsevimab administered before the RSV season protected healthy late-preterm and term infants from medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection4. Widespread RSV vaccination can have a significant positive impact on public health, particularly in reducing the burden of RSV infections in infants. By vaccinating infants against RSV, the number of severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract infections could significantly decrease, resulting in a reduction in hospitalizations and associated healthcare costs. Widespread vaccination may not only protect vaccinated infants but also provide indirect protection to unvaccinated individuals within the community, including other vulnerable populations, by reducing overall RSV transmission rates4,5. By preventing RSV-related hospitalizations and medical interventions, widespread vaccination can lead to significant economic savings for healthcare systems and families alike. While exceptionally rare, some concerns have been raised about vaccine-related encephalitis. However, extensive safety monitoring during clinical trials and post-approval surveillance has not shown any evidence of a causal link between RSV vaccination and encephalitis5. The RSV vaccine is recommended for all infants born prematurely, before 29 weeks of gestation, and infants with chronic lung disease. Additionally, infants born at 29–35 weeks of gestation may also benefit from the vaccine during RSV season, typically in the colder months. Healthcare providers usually administer the RSV injection in multiple doses during the RSV season. It is crucial for caregivers to strictly adhere to the recommended schedule to ensure optimal protection for their infants. Caregivers should consult their pediatrician or healthcare provider to assess their infant’s eligibility for the RSV vaccine5. Ethical approval Ethics approval was not required for this article. Consent Informed consent was not required for this article. Sources of funding Not applicable. Author contribution A.N., R.F., and A.N.: conceptualization of ideas, critical reviews with comments, and final draft. All authors approved the final manuscript. Conflicts of interest disclosure There are no conflicts of interest. Research registration unique identifying number (UIN) Not applicable. Guarantor Abubakar Nazir, Oli Health Magazine Organization, Research and Education, Kigali, Rwanda; E-mail: [email protected]; ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6650-6982. Data availability statement Not applicable. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,028
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,980

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,028
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,104
Tête enseignante GPT0,423
Écart entre enseignants0,319 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of SurgeryMême sujetRespiratory viral infections researchTravaux en français237 207