MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389745521 · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000000698

FDA grants approval to the RSV vaccine (nirsevimab-alip) for all infants: a leap forward for shielding the smallest

2023· editorial· en· W4389745521 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abubakar Nazir, Rida Fatima, Awais Nazir

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surgery · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRespiratory tract infectionsRespiratory tractPediatricsRespiratory systemLower respiratory tract infectionPalivizumabDiseaseVirusPathogenIntensive care medicineImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highlights Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a ubiquitous pathogen that affects the respiratory tract, primarily targeting infants, young children, and the elderly. It is one of the leading causes of severe lower respiratory tract infections in infants. Recently, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the RSV injection for all infants. The approval of Beyfortus relied partly on data obtained from the phase 3 MELODY trial. It is found that a single injection of nirsevimab administered before the RSV season protected healthy late-preterm and term infants from medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a ubiquitous pathogen that affects the respiratory tract, primarily targeting infants, young children, and the elderly. It is one of the leading causes of severe lower respiratory tract infections in infants and can pose significant health risks, especially to premature babies and those with underlying health conditions. RSV is highly contagious and spreads through respiratory droplets, making it a major concern for healthcare1. RSV has long been a cause of concern for parents and caregivers due to its potential to lead to severe respiratory illness in infants. In the United States, approximately 80 000 children under the age of 5 are hospitalized each year due to RSV infection. While most cases are mild, infants under 6 months, premature infants, and children with weakened immune systems or neuromuscular disorders are particularly susceptible to severe illness, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1. Previously, there were no licensed vaccines specifically for RSV available for routine use in children1. However, a ray of hope has emerged in the realm of pediatric healthcare with the recent approval of the RSV injection by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for all infants. The monoclonal antibody Beyfortus (nirsevimab-alip), which has already received approval for use in Europe and Canada, is intended for administration to newborns and infants who are either born during or entering their first RSV season. Additionally, it is recommended for children up to 24 months old who face a heightened risk of severe RSV infection during their second RSV season2. The approval of Beyfortus relied partly on data obtained from the phase 3 MELODY trial2. The trial demonstrated that the injection led to a 74.9% reduction in medically attended lower respiratory tract infections related to RSV compared to the placebo group [with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 50.6–87.3; P<0.001]3. A total of 1490 infants were included in the study, with 994 infants assigned to the nirsevimab group and 496 infants to the placebo group. Medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection was observed in 12 infants (1.2%) in the nirsevimab group and 25 infants (5.0%) in the placebo group. This indicates that nirsevimab demonstrated an efficacy of 74.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 49.6–87.1; P<0.001] in preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection3. Regarding hospitalization due to RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection, 6 infants (0.6%) in the nirsevimab group and 8 infants (1.6%) in the placebo group required hospitalization. The efficacy of nirsevimab in reducing hospitalizations was estimated at 62.1% (95% CI, −8.6 to 86.8; P=0.07). Thus, it was found that a single injection of nirsevimab administered before the RSV season protected healthy late-preterm and term infants from medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection4. Widespread RSV vaccination can have a significant positive impact on public health, particularly in reducing the burden of RSV infections in infants. By vaccinating infants against RSV, the number of severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract infections could significantly decrease, resulting in a reduction in hospitalizations and associated healthcare costs. Widespread vaccination may not only protect vaccinated infants but also provide indirect protection to unvaccinated individuals within the community, including other vulnerable populations, by reducing overall RSV transmission rates4,5. By preventing RSV-related hospitalizations and medical interventions, widespread vaccination can lead to significant economic savings for healthcare systems and families alike. While exceptionally rare, some concerns have been raised about vaccine-related encephalitis. However, extensive safety monitoring during clinical trials and post-approval surveillance has not shown any evidence of a causal link between RSV vaccination and encephalitis5. The RSV vaccine is recommended for all infants born prematurely, before 29 weeks of gestation, and infants with chronic lung disease. Additionally, infants born at 29–35 weeks of gestation may also benefit from the vaccine during RSV season, typically in the colder months. Healthcare providers usually administer the RSV injection in multiple doses during the RSV season. It is crucial for caregivers to strictly adhere to the recommended schedule to ensure optimal protection for their infants. Caregivers should consult their pediatrician or healthcare provider to assess their infant’s eligibility for the RSV vaccine5. Ethical approval Ethics approval was not required for this article. Consent Informed consent was not required for this article. Sources of funding Not applicable. Author contribution A.N., R.F., and A.N.: conceptualization of ideas, critical reviews with comments, and final draft. All authors approved the final manuscript. Conflicts of interest disclosure There are no conflicts of interest. Research registration unique identifying number (UIN) Not applicable. Guarantor Abubakar Nazir, Oli Health Magazine Organization, Research and Education, Kigali, Rwanda; E-mail: [email protected]; ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6650-6982. Data availability statement Not applicable. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of SurgerySame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207