MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389817077 · doi:10.1353/sym.2023.a914673

Canadian Truckers' Protest: Setting Lacan on His Feet?

2023· article· en· W4389817077 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clint Burnham

Notice bibliographique

Revuesymplokē · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychoanalysisPsychologyCriminologySociologyHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Canadian Truckers' Protest:Setting Lacan on His Feet? Clint Burnham (bio) In 2022, a convoy of trucks traveled across Canada protesting COVID-19 vaccination mandates and gathering thousands of semitrailers, RVs, pickup trucks, and other vehicles before arriving in Ottawa on January 29. Ottawa is the capital of Canada, and semitrailers proceeded to occupy downtown streets near the federal legislature—the House of Commons—for more than two weeks, committing acts of disturbance large and small (from the desecration of a war monument and the harassment of mask-wearing residents to 24/7 airhorns and the setting up of hot tubs and bouncy castles). Spuriously linked to gilets jaunes protests—but also displaying Confederate flags and Nazi regalia—it was not exactly clear if protesters were in the majority even truck drivers. What was clear was the inability of local, provincial, and federal police to deal with the protesters (who were open about receiving back-channel information from police, former military, and national intelligence operatives); on February 14 the federal government invoked the Emergencies Act, and police cleared the protest on February 17, almost three weeks after its start. Solidarity protests at two major crossings into the US—in Alberta and Ontario—which had immense economic effects, were also cleared or disbanded (Wikipedia 2022). The convoy inspired similar actions or at least sympathy demonstrations as far away as New Zealand; like the January 6 riot a year earlier in DC, they offer us a way of thinking about COVID-era political actions as, I will argue, an example not simply of Hegel's rabble, of the deplorables that Oliver Davis and Tim Dean have cited in their Rancière-inspired Hatred of Sex (2022), but also of the "coincidence of opposites," whereby ideology functions via transgression and knowledge tangos with enjoyment. Before that, we should take account of an important Freudo-Lacanian argument with respect to jouissance and knowledge. Todd McGowan has provocatively argued that simple education will not work to eradicate racism, based as the latter is on jouissance, on the unconscious. As Freud (1957, 225) remarks, "If knowledge about the unconscious were as important for the patient as people inexperienced in psychoanalysis imagine, [End Page 413] listening to lectures or reading books would be enough to cure him. Such measures, however, have as much influence on the symptoms of nervous illness as a distribution of menu-cards in a time of famine have upon hunger."1 To which McGowan adds, "If one tries to correct racist ideas by giving people better information, one inevitably fails because one does not touch the unconscious" (2022, 193–94n). Rather, anti-racist education of the "white fragility" sort triggers racists and racism alike and "regularly results," as Freud puts it, "in an intensification of the conflict in him and an exacerbation of his troubles." To this argument we can add a significant later concept of Lacan from his essay "Lituraterre," where he designates as the "littoral" the edge or beyond-limit between knowledge and enjoyment (the littoral or edge of river or ocean as the limit of the water; Lacan 2001).2 Jouissance, that is, is what lies beyond knowledge, which in this text, as often in later Lacan, designates not so much truth (which is only ever uncovered, it seems, in the analytic session but usually remains unconscious) as the "university discourse," the scientific register but also literary studies, psychology, and whatever else is the object of Lacan's wrath on a given day.3 McGowan and Lacan's arguments are instructive, however, for they help us understand the anti-vaxxers' alienation and their imperviousness to well-meaning education campaigns, whether of the top-down social media and state varieties or the more peer-based friends and family or family doctor. Essentially, both forms of education or knowledge—through personal contacts or the medium of the digital—come wrapped up in the psychic resonances of enjoyment, anxiety, disavowal, foreclosure, and the like. We are no more likely to listen to our family physician (leaving aside the number of folks who lack such primary care, whether due to medical insurance inequalities or sheer lack of family physicians or global health shortages) with...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,567
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuesymplokēMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207