MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389817077 · doi:10.1353/sym.2023.a914673

Canadian Truckers' Protest: Setting Lacan on His Feet?

2023· article· en· W4389817077 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clint Burnham

Bibliographic record

Venuesymplokē · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychoanalysisPsychologyCriminologySociologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian Truckers' Protest:Setting Lacan on His Feet? Clint Burnham (bio) In 2022, a convoy of trucks traveled across Canada protesting COVID-19 vaccination mandates and gathering thousands of semitrailers, RVs, pickup trucks, and other vehicles before arriving in Ottawa on January 29. Ottawa is the capital of Canada, and semitrailers proceeded to occupy downtown streets near the federal legislature—the House of Commons—for more than two weeks, committing acts of disturbance large and small (from the desecration of a war monument and the harassment of mask-wearing residents to 24/7 airhorns and the setting up of hot tubs and bouncy castles). Spuriously linked to gilets jaunes protests—but also displaying Confederate flags and Nazi regalia—it was not exactly clear if protesters were in the majority even truck drivers. What was clear was the inability of local, provincial, and federal police to deal with the protesters (who were open about receiving back-channel information from police, former military, and national intelligence operatives); on February 14 the federal government invoked the Emergencies Act, and police cleared the protest on February 17, almost three weeks after its start. Solidarity protests at two major crossings into the US—in Alberta and Ontario—which had immense economic effects, were also cleared or disbanded (Wikipedia 2022). The convoy inspired similar actions or at least sympathy demonstrations as far away as New Zealand; like the January 6 riot a year earlier in DC, they offer us a way of thinking about COVID-era political actions as, I will argue, an example not simply of Hegel's rabble, of the deplorables that Oliver Davis and Tim Dean have cited in their Rancière-inspired Hatred of Sex (2022), but also of the "coincidence of opposites," whereby ideology functions via transgression and knowledge tangos with enjoyment. Before that, we should take account of an important Freudo-Lacanian argument with respect to jouissance and knowledge. Todd McGowan has provocatively argued that simple education will not work to eradicate racism, based as the latter is on jouissance, on the unconscious. As Freud (1957, 225) remarks, "If knowledge about the unconscious were as important for the patient as people inexperienced in psychoanalysis imagine, [End Page 413] listening to lectures or reading books would be enough to cure him. Such measures, however, have as much influence on the symptoms of nervous illness as a distribution of menu-cards in a time of famine have upon hunger."1 To which McGowan adds, "If one tries to correct racist ideas by giving people better information, one inevitably fails because one does not touch the unconscious" (2022, 193–94n). Rather, anti-racist education of the "white fragility" sort triggers racists and racism alike and "regularly results," as Freud puts it, "in an intensification of the conflict in him and an exacerbation of his troubles." To this argument we can add a significant later concept of Lacan from his essay "Lituraterre," where he designates as the "littoral" the edge or beyond-limit between knowledge and enjoyment (the littoral or edge of river or ocean as the limit of the water; Lacan 2001).2 Jouissance, that is, is what lies beyond knowledge, which in this text, as often in later Lacan, designates not so much truth (which is only ever uncovered, it seems, in the analytic session but usually remains unconscious) as the "university discourse," the scientific register but also literary studies, psychology, and whatever else is the object of Lacan's wrath on a given day.3 McGowan and Lacan's arguments are instructive, however, for they help us understand the anti-vaxxers' alienation and their imperviousness to well-meaning education campaigns, whether of the top-down social media and state varieties or the more peer-based friends and family or family doctor. Essentially, both forms of education or knowledge—through personal contacts or the medium of the digital—come wrapped up in the psychic resonances of enjoyment, anxiety, disavowal, foreclosure, and the like. We are no more likely to listen to our family physician (leaving aside the number of folks who lack such primary care, whether due to medical insurance inequalities or sheer lack of family physicians or global health shortages) with...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuesymplokēSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207