P1039 RECtal OUtcomes in Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis (RECOUP-UC): An International Clinical Practice Survey of Paediatric Gastroenterologists
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in childhood is associated with a higher risk of developing acute severe colitis and colectomy compared to adult populations. Following subtotal colectomy, the rectal remnant is typically oversewn and remains in-situ until ileal continuity surgery is undertaken. Access to such surgical expertise determines the timing of restorative surgery, which may range from months to years. There is a paucity of data regarding residual rectal activity during this interval, its medical management and clinical outcomes. Methods An electronic survey (SurveyMonkey) of clinical practice was disseminated to the paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) community internationally. Data collected included treating centre demographics, local colectomy practices, expert opinion on rectal cuff assessment and management. Clinicians were asked to rank order the symptoms and signs considered most relevant to determining disease activity. They also ranked the clinical features they believed most important to patients. Descriptive statistics were used to present findings. Results Responses were collated from over 10 countries, including Ireland, Sweden, UK, Australia, Israel, Canada, Iran, Finland, UAE and Austria. Centre sizes were categorised based on total PIBD population. There was heterogeneity across centres - 16% of respondents were from small volume centres in the range of 0-100 patients, 45% were from medium sized centres (101-300), 25% were from large volume centres (301-500) and 12% treat >500 patients which we categorised as very large volume. Despite variation in centre volume majority of respondents (75%) diagnose >20 new cases of UC annually. Over 90% of respondents reported having no formal guideline for managing rectal disease. Most centres’ patients (60%) waited at least 3 months post-colectomy for restoration surgery. Mild intermittent symptoms were expected to continue by 60% of respondents. Of these symptoms, 45% ranked haematochezia as the most important in determining severity. There was no consensus on the best assessment tool to use; 30% use the PUCAI. Most (80%) use blood markers and endoscopy routinely to assess rectal activity. Favoured treatments include rectal therapy (80%) followed by oral steroids and surgical referral. All respondents agreed that additional research was needed. Conclusion International management of the rectum following subtotal colectomy in children is characterised by variable clinical practises, and a lack of guidelines or validated assessment tools. Additional research in the field is needed to address current literature deficits and improve care for children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».