1878 - Is a Well-Functioning THA at Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture? A Biomechanical Study of Willed Joints
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic fracture after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the number four reason for revision, accounting for 7-10% of all revisions (Swedish Joint Registry 2010, Australian Joint Registry 2014). In addition to implant loosening, femoral bone quality is a major risk factor of periprosthetic fracture. The overall goal of this study was to establish a model that determines the risk of periprosthetic fracture as a function of periprosthetic BMD and femoral stem material and fixation method. The study incorporated a series of autopsy-retrieved, clinically asymptomatic hip joints with implanted total hip replacements that had been in-vivo for 1 u2013 29 years, acquired through a willed joint body program at our institution. The specimens varied in stem design, alloy and fixation method, and time in-situ. No patient had been scheduled for a revision at the time of death and all patients were ambulatory. Therefore, the specimens incorporate the loss of BMD or any osteolysis that occurred as a result of in-vivo usage, providing a novel opportunity for assessment of periprosthetic fracture risk. METHODS: 29 postmortem proximal femurs with THA that had been in clinical service for 1 u2013 29 years prior to the patientu2019s death, and known clinical histories, were obtained then disarticulated and radiographed prior to testing. The femoral stems included 5 cemented Ti alloy stems, 6 non-cemented Ti alloy stems, 14 cemented stainless steel or CoCr alloy stems, and 4 non-cemented CoCr stems. For the present study our goal was to simulate in-vivo bodyweight forces on the hip joint. The specimens were flash-frozen within 24 hours of death, and thawed 8 hours prior to experimentation. All specimens (n = 29) were disarticulated, radiographed, and scanned using DEXA to assess bone mineral density prior to testing. Each femur was loaded using a protocol previously established for simulating physiological activities. Specifically, combined axial and torsional loading were applied cyclically, starting from a peak of 100 N and u00b11 Nm, and increasing to a peak load of 700 N and u00b15 Nm acting on the distal femoral shaft. The femoral head was loaded through a sized cup that allowed free mediolateral translation while transmitting torsional loads to the femoral shaft. Triaxial rosette strain gauges were applied to the following locations of interest on each cortical shaft: 2 on the lateral surface, one at the stem tip level and one 15 mm distal, and 2 on the anterior surface, again one at the stem tip level and one 15 mm distal. RESULTS: Despite the conservatively low maximum load of 1x body weight that was applied, three femurs fractured at the stem tip during loading, so that their data could not be included in the analysis: one non-cemented Ti alloy stem and 2 non-cemented CoCr alloy stems. As this left only 2 viable noncemented CoCr alloy stems, that data is not presented here. All specimens experienced higher strains on the lateral surface than on the anterior surface, indicating that the bending loads in the frontal plane, rather than axial/torsional loads, had the predominant effect (Figure 1). While average values of principal and shear strains were similar (p = 0.65 and p = 0.86 respectively), maximum strain values were substantially higher in the femurs with cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems than with cemented Ti alloy stems. At the lateral stem-tip, cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems (n = 14) experienced maximum principal strains of up to 2640 u00b5 while cemented Ti alloy stems (n = 5) experienced maximum principal strains of up to 1546 u00b5. Similarly at the anterior stem-tip site, cemented stainless-steel and CoCr alloy stems experienced maximum principal strains of up to 1582 u00b5 while cemented Ti alloy stems only reached maximum values of 962 u00b5, despite similar average strains (p = 0.83). The same types of differences were observed at the lateral site distal to the stem tip, where cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems reached maximum principal strains of 2696 u00b5 and cemented Ti alloy stems only reached 1472 u00b5, with a difference between average values of 102 u00b5 (p = 0.71). Finally, the maximum shear strains in cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems saw increases of 1000 u00b5 and 1300 u00b5 over the maximum shear values of cemented Ti alloy stems (Table 1). Similarly, non-cemented Ti alloy stems experienced substantially higher strain than cemented Ti alloy stems. At the lateral stem-tip, non-cemented Ti alloy stems (n = 6) experienced maximum principal strains of up to 2487 u00b5 while cemented Ti alloy stems experienced maximum principal strains of up to 1546 u00b5. At the lateral site distal to the stem tip non-cemented Ti alloy stems reached maximum principal strains of up to 2323 u00b5 and cemented Ti alloy stems only reached 1472 u00b5, with a difference between average values of 270 u00b5 (p = 0.48). Finally, the maximum shear strains of non-cemented Ti alloy stems at the lateral sites saw increases of 800 u00b5 over the maximum shear values of cemented Ti alloy stems. There was a significant correlation between BMD measured by DEXA in Gruen Zone 4 (at the distal stem tip) and principal strains (Pearsonu2019s Correlation Coefficient = -0.51, p = 0.013) (Figure 2), with higher strains corresponding to lower BMD. DISCUSSION: The average strains at the lateral and anterior aspects of the femur near the stem tip were not significantly different among the three groups. Nevertheless, the two groups with cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems and non-cemented Ti alloy stems both included femurs that experienced high strains in excess of 2000 u00b5 while undergoing simulated loads of 1x body weight, indicating that a low-energy trauma event would increase the strain sufficiently to result in Vancouver Type-B fracture in both groups (cortical bone strain failure 4000 u2013 8000 u00b5). In contrast, the group with cemented Ti alloy stems never reached the 2000 u00b5 threshold. This was corroborated by the result of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry which indicated a clear inverse correlation between bone quality and maximum principal strain. The maximum strains correspond to a higher risk of Vancouver Type-B fractures, as these strains of 2000 u2013 2500 u00b5 resulted only from a conservative body-weight load of 700 N. It is well known that normal activities result in hip joint reaction forces 2-3 times body weight, and sudden low-energy traumatic events such as stumbling can result in even higher loads. Therefore, simple events can easily cause strains in excess of 5000 u00b5, likely resulting in fracture. RELEVANCE: Despite the fact that THA in the present study were in successful clinical service until the patientu2019s death, the results of the present study indicated that some of the femurs with rigid cemented or non-cemented implants were both potentially at high risk for Vancouver Type-B fractures. The results call for prophylactic measures in THA patients, including those with cemented stems, to avoid or preempt even minor traumatic incidents.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».