1878 - Is a Well-Functioning THA at Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture? A Biomechanical Study of Willed Joints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic fracture after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the number four reason for revision, accounting for 7-10% of all revisions (Swedish Joint Registry 2010, Australian Joint Registry 2014). In addition to implant loosening, femoral bone quality is a major risk factor of periprosthetic fracture. The overall goal of this study was to establish a model that determines the risk of periprosthetic fracture as a function of periprosthetic BMD and femoral stem material and fixation method. The study incorporated a series of autopsy-retrieved, clinically asymptomatic hip joints with implanted total hip replacements that had been in-vivo for 1 u2013 29 years, acquired through a willed joint body program at our institution. The specimens varied in stem design, alloy and fixation method, and time in-situ. No patient had been scheduled for a revision at the time of death and all patients were ambulatory. Therefore, the specimens incorporate the loss of BMD or any osteolysis that occurred as a result of in-vivo usage, providing a novel opportunity for assessment of periprosthetic fracture risk. METHODS: 29 postmortem proximal femurs with THA that had been in clinical service for 1 u2013 29 years prior to the patientu2019s death, and known clinical histories, were obtained then disarticulated and radiographed prior to testing. The femoral stems included 5 cemented Ti alloy stems, 6 non-cemented Ti alloy stems, 14 cemented stainless steel or CoCr alloy stems, and 4 non-cemented CoCr stems. For the present study our goal was to simulate in-vivo bodyweight forces on the hip joint. The specimens were flash-frozen within 24 hours of death, and thawed 8 hours prior to experimentation. All specimens (n = 29) were disarticulated, radiographed, and scanned using DEXA to assess bone mineral density prior to testing. Each femur was loaded using a protocol previously established for simulating physiological activities. Specifically, combined axial and torsional loading were applied cyclically, starting from a peak of 100 N and u00b11 Nm, and increasing to a peak load of 700 N and u00b15 Nm acting on the distal femoral shaft. The femoral head was loaded through a sized cup that allowed free mediolateral translation while transmitting torsional loads to the femoral shaft. Triaxial rosette strain gauges were applied to the following locations of interest on each cortical shaft: 2 on the lateral surface, one at the stem tip level and one 15 mm distal, and 2 on the anterior surface, again one at the stem tip level and one 15 mm distal. RESULTS: Despite the conservatively low maximum load of 1x body weight that was applied, three femurs fractured at the stem tip during loading, so that their data could not be included in the analysis: one non-cemented Ti alloy stem and 2 non-cemented CoCr alloy stems. As this left only 2 viable noncemented CoCr alloy stems, that data is not presented here. All specimens experienced higher strains on the lateral surface than on the anterior surface, indicating that the bending loads in the frontal plane, rather than axial/torsional loads, had the predominant effect (Figure 1). While average values of principal and shear strains were similar (p = 0.65 and p = 0.86 respectively), maximum strain values were substantially higher in the femurs with cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems than with cemented Ti alloy stems. At the lateral stem-tip, cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems (n = 14) experienced maximum principal strains of up to 2640 u00b5 while cemented Ti alloy stems (n = 5) experienced maximum principal strains of up to 1546 u00b5. Similarly at the anterior stem-tip site, cemented stainless-steel and CoCr alloy stems experienced maximum principal strains of up to 1582 u00b5 while cemented Ti alloy stems only reached maximum values of 962 u00b5, despite similar average strains (p = 0.83). The same types of differences were observed at the lateral site distal to the stem tip, where cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems reached maximum principal strains of 2696 u00b5 and cemented Ti alloy stems only reached 1472 u00b5, with a difference between average values of 102 u00b5 (p = 0.71). Finally, the maximum shear strains in cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems saw increases of 1000 u00b5 and 1300 u00b5 over the maximum shear values of cemented Ti alloy stems (Table 1). Similarly, non-cemented Ti alloy stems experienced substantially higher strain than cemented Ti alloy stems. At the lateral stem-tip, non-cemented Ti alloy stems (n = 6) experienced maximum principal strains of up to 2487 u00b5 while cemented Ti alloy stems experienced maximum principal strains of up to 1546 u00b5. At the lateral site distal to the stem tip non-cemented Ti alloy stems reached maximum principal strains of up to 2323 u00b5 and cemented Ti alloy stems only reached 1472 u00b5, with a difference between average values of 270 u00b5 (p = 0.48). Finally, the maximum shear strains of non-cemented Ti alloy stems at the lateral sites saw increases of 800 u00b5 over the maximum shear values of cemented Ti alloy stems. There was a significant correlation between BMD measured by DEXA in Gruen Zone 4 (at the distal stem tip) and principal strains (Pearsonu2019s Correlation Coefficient = -0.51, p = 0.013) (Figure 2), with higher strains corresponding to lower BMD. DISCUSSION: The average strains at the lateral and anterior aspects of the femur near the stem tip were not significantly different among the three groups. Nevertheless, the two groups with cemented stainless-steel or CoCr alloy stems and non-cemented Ti alloy stems both included femurs that experienced high strains in excess of 2000 u00b5 while undergoing simulated loads of 1x body weight, indicating that a low-energy trauma event would increase the strain sufficiently to result in Vancouver Type-B fracture in both groups (cortical bone strain failure 4000 u2013 8000 u00b5). In contrast, the group with cemented Ti alloy stems never reached the 2000 u00b5 threshold. This was corroborated by the result of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry which indicated a clear inverse correlation between bone quality and maximum principal strain. The maximum strains correspond to a higher risk of Vancouver Type-B fractures, as these strains of 2000 u2013 2500 u00b5 resulted only from a conservative body-weight load of 700 N. It is well known that normal activities result in hip joint reaction forces 2-3 times body weight, and sudden low-energy traumatic events such as stumbling can result in even higher loads. Therefore, simple events can easily cause strains in excess of 5000 u00b5, likely resulting in fracture. RELEVANCE: Despite the fact that THA in the present study were in successful clinical service until the patientu2019s death, the results of the present study indicated that some of the femurs with rigid cemented or non-cemented implants were both potentially at high risk for Vancouver Type-B fractures. The results call for prophylactic measures in THA patients, including those with cemented stems, to avoid or preempt even minor traumatic incidents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".