Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia: Powhatan People and the Color Line by Laura J. Feller (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia: Powhatan People and the Color Line by Laura J. Feller Gregory D. Smithers Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia: Powhatan People and the Color Line. By Laura J. Feller. (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2022. Pp. x, 275. Paper, $29.95, ISBN 978-0-8061-9389-2; cloth, $45.00, ISBN 978-0-8061-9065-5.) Historian Laura J. Feller's Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia: Powhatan People and the Color Line is the latest scholarly analysis of race, "blood," and Indigenous identity in the Tidewater region of Virginia. Focusing [End Page 165] particularly on the Pamunkey, Mattaponi, and Chickahominy communities between the James and Rappahannock Rivers, Feller examines the complexities of clan and kinship identities against the backdrop of Virginia's infamous racial purity law of 1924. This is well-trodden historical ground, but Feller's book is interested in how law and institutional racism help us understand the responses of Indigenous families both on and off the reservation. Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia is a compact book. Between an introduction and epilogue are five chapters. In these chapters, Feller builds on the ethnohistorical work of Helen Rountree and on more recent historical scholarship by Mikaëla M. Adams to deepen our understanding of the history of Native Virginia from the mid-nineteenth century to the early twentieth. As such, Feller mines the archives of the Commonwealth of Virginia and returns to the papers of key figures in advancing notions of racial purity in Virginia, namely, Earnest Sevier Cox, John Powell, and Walter Plecker. In the introduction, Feller asserts that her argument aligns with the prevailing historiography in contending that "meaningful and realistic ways of defining Native identities reflect not blood quantum, but rather group participation and relationships of reciprocity among members of a community" (p. 11). This is not a particularly original argument. However, Feller seeks to stake her claim to originality by borrowing from social scientists Michael Omi and Howard Winant and contending that Native Virginians responded to racism by embracing "strategic essentialism," thereby enabling Indigenous people to adopt pan-Indian identities as a means of navigating racist laws and institutional practices (p. 10). Feller develops her argument by focusing variously on individual families and reservation communities. In chapter 1, for example, she takes us back to the mid-nineteenth century and introduces us to the Scott family. Lucy Pearman Scott and William Scott, reacting to prejudice against Powhatan peoples, sought opportunities elsewhere and migrated to Canada. In contrast, the Wynn family navigated Virginia's racial discourses on "mulattoes" and "authentic" Indians to establish a niche for themselves in the commonwealth wherein white Virginians saw them as Native. In late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century Virginia, projecting one's Indigeneity meant actively cultivating social distance from African American people. As eugenic thinking took root, that strategy proved to be an increasingly difficult task. Chapter 2 explores the key figures behind the push for racial integrity in early-twentieth-century Virginia. Walter Plecker aggressively pursued racial integrity through a variety of public-pressure campaigns and bureaucratic genocide. Importantly, Native Virginians continued developing strategies for dealing with institutionalized forms of racism. Feller reminds us in chapter 3 that reservation communities, such as the Pamunkey, worked hard to assert their "authenticity" as Native people through public displays of Indigeneity that were recognizable to white people. These strategic displays of Indianness proved frustrating for a generation of ethnographers. For instance, scholars such as Frank Speck sought out Native communities as subjects of authentic Indigenous culture. No culture is ever static for long. In chapter 5, Feller makes this point by highlighting the strategies employed by Virginia reservations since the late nineteenth century to maintain a resilient sense of community. [End Page 166] Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia makes a solid contribution to historical knowledge of Indigeneity and race in the commonwealth. To experts in the field, though, there is not a lot in this book that will read as new or revelatory. In fact, some readers will question why Feller did not engage with descendant Indigenous communities in Tidewater Virginia to enrich her analysis. Such engagement would have enriched the...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».