MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391780297 · doi:10.1353/soh.2024.a919000

Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia: Powhatan People and the Color Line by Laura J. Feller (review)

2024· article· en· W4391780297 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gregory D. Smithers

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Southern History · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColor lineIndigenousLine (geometry)HistoryGenealogyArtArt historySociologyGender studiesMathematicsGeometryRace (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia: Powhatan People and the Color Line by Laura J. Feller Gregory D. Smithers Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia: Powhatan People and the Color Line. By Laura J. Feller. (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2022. Pp. x, 275. Paper, $29.95, ISBN 978-0-8061-9389-2; cloth, $45.00, ISBN 978-0-8061-9065-5.) Historian Laura J. Feller's Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia: Powhatan People and the Color Line is the latest scholarly analysis of race, "blood," and Indigenous identity in the Tidewater region of Virginia. Focusing [End Page 165] particularly on the Pamunkey, Mattaponi, and Chickahominy communities between the James and Rappahannock Rivers, Feller examines the complexities of clan and kinship identities against the backdrop of Virginia's infamous racial purity law of 1924. This is well-trodden historical ground, but Feller's book is interested in how law and institutional racism help us understand the responses of Indigenous families both on and off the reservation. Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia is a compact book. Between an introduction and epilogue are five chapters. In these chapters, Feller builds on the ethnohistorical work of Helen Rountree and on more recent historical scholarship by Mikaëla M. Adams to deepen our understanding of the history of Native Virginia from the mid-nineteenth century to the early twentieth. As such, Feller mines the archives of the Commonwealth of Virginia and returns to the papers of key figures in advancing notions of racial purity in Virginia, namely, Earnest Sevier Cox, John Powell, and Walter Plecker. In the introduction, Feller asserts that her argument aligns with the prevailing historiography in contending that "meaningful and realistic ways of defining Native identities reflect not blood quantum, but rather group participation and relationships of reciprocity among members of a community" (p. 11). This is not a particularly original argument. However, Feller seeks to stake her claim to originality by borrowing from social scientists Michael Omi and Howard Winant and contending that Native Virginians responded to racism by embracing "strategic essentialism," thereby enabling Indigenous people to adopt pan-Indian identities as a means of navigating racist laws and institutional practices (p. 10). Feller develops her argument by focusing variously on individual families and reservation communities. In chapter 1, for example, she takes us back to the mid-nineteenth century and introduces us to the Scott family. Lucy Pearman Scott and William Scott, reacting to prejudice against Powhatan peoples, sought opportunities elsewhere and migrated to Canada. In contrast, the Wynn family navigated Virginia's racial discourses on "mulattoes" and "authentic" Indians to establish a niche for themselves in the commonwealth wherein white Virginians saw them as Native. In late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century Virginia, projecting one's Indigeneity meant actively cultivating social distance from African American people. As eugenic thinking took root, that strategy proved to be an increasingly difficult task. Chapter 2 explores the key figures behind the push for racial integrity in early-twentieth-century Virginia. Walter Plecker aggressively pursued racial integrity through a variety of public-pressure campaigns and bureaucratic genocide. Importantly, Native Virginians continued developing strategies for dealing with institutionalized forms of racism. Feller reminds us in chapter 3 that reservation communities, such as the Pamunkey, worked hard to assert their "authenticity" as Native people through public displays of Indigeneity that were recognizable to white people. These strategic displays of Indianness proved frustrating for a generation of ethnographers. For instance, scholars such as Frank Speck sought out Native communities as subjects of authentic Indigenous culture. No culture is ever static for long. In chapter 5, Feller makes this point by highlighting the strategies employed by Virginia reservations since the late nineteenth century to maintain a resilient sense of community. [End Page 166] Being Indigenous in Jim Crow Virginia makes a solid contribution to historical knowledge of Indigeneity and race in the commonwealth. To experts in the field, though, there is not a lot in this book that will read as new or revelatory. In fact, some readers will question why Feller did not engage with descendant Indigenous communities in Tidewater Virginia to enrich her analysis. Such engagement would have enriched the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Southern HistorySame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207