MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4391934544 · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.039

Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI to Quantify Ventilation: Feasibility and Physiological Relevance in Severe Asthma

2024· article· en· W4391934544 sur OpenAlex
Yonni Friedlander, Samal Munidasa, A. Thakar, Nandhitha Ragunayakam, Carmen Venegas, Melanie Kjarsgaard, Brandon Zanette, Dante P. I. Capaldi, Giles Santyr, Parameswaran Nair, Sarah Svenningsen

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Radiology · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick ChildrenMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoSt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Organismes subventionnairesCanada Research ChairsTeva Pharmaceutical Industries
Mots-clésAsthmaMedicineLungVentilation (architecture)Clinical significanceRelevance (law)Lung ventilationIntensive care medicineRadiologyPathologyInternal medicinePhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Rationale and ObjectivesEmergent evidence in several respiratory diseases supports translational potential for Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI to spatially quantify ventilation but its feasibility and physiological relevance have not been demonstrated in patients with asthma. This study compares PREFUL-derived ventilation defect percent (VDP) in severe asthma patients to healthy controls and measures its responsiveness to bronchodilator therapy and relation to established measures of airways disease.Materials and MethodsForty-one adults with severe asthma and seven healthy controls performed same-day free-breathing 1H MRI, 129Xe MRI, spirometry, and oscillometry. A subset of participants (n = 23) performed chest CT and another subset of participants with asthma (n = 19) repeated 1H MRI following the administration of a bronchodilator. VDP was calculated for both PREFUL and 129Xe MRI. Additionally, the percent of functional small airways disease was determined from CT parametric response maps (PRMfSAD).ResultsPREFUL VDP measured pre-bronchodilator (19.1% [7.4–43.3], p = 0.0002) and post-bronchodilator (16.9% [6.1–38.4], p = 0.0007) were significantly greater than that of healthy controls (7.5% [3.7–15.5]) and was significantly decreased post-bronchodilator (from 21.9% [10.1–36.9] to 16.9% [6.1–38.4], p = 0.0053). PREFUL VDP was correlated with spirometry (FEV1%pred: r = −0.46, p = 0.0023; FVC%pred: r = −0.35, p = 0.024, FEV1/FVC: r = −0.46, p = 0.0028), 129Xe MRI VDP (r = 0.39, p = 0.013), and metrics of small airway disease (CT PRMfSAD: r = 0.55, p = 0.021; Xrs5 Hz: r = −0.44, p = 0.0046, and AX: r = 0.32, p = 0.044).ConclusionPREFUL-derived VDP is responsive to bronchodilator therapy in asthma and is associated with measures of airflow obstruction and small airway dysfunction. These findings validate PREFUL VDP as a physiologically relevant and accessible ventilation imaging outcome measure in asthma. Emergent evidence in several respiratory diseases supports translational potential for Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI to spatially quantify ventilation but its feasibility and physiological relevance have not been demonstrated in patients with asthma. This study compares PREFUL-derived ventilation defect percent (VDP) in severe asthma patients to healthy controls and measures its responsiveness to bronchodilator therapy and relation to established measures of airways disease. Forty-one adults with severe asthma and seven healthy controls performed same-day free-breathing 1H MRI, 129Xe MRI, spirometry, and oscillometry. A subset of participants (n = 23) performed chest CT and another subset of participants with asthma (n = 19) repeated 1H MRI following the administration of a bronchodilator. VDP was calculated for both PREFUL and 129Xe MRI. Additionally, the percent of functional small airways disease was determined from CT parametric response maps (PRMfSAD). PREFUL VDP measured pre-bronchodilator (19.1% [7.4–43.3], p = 0.0002) and post-bronchodilator (16.9% [6.1–38.4], p = 0.0007) were significantly greater than that of healthy controls (7.5% [3.7–15.5]) and was significantly decreased post-bronchodilator (from 21.9% [10.1–36.9] to 16.9% [6.1–38.4], p = 0.0053). PREFUL VDP was correlated with spirometry (FEV1%pred: r = −0.46, p = 0.0023; FVC%pred: r = −0.35, p = 0.024, FEV1/FVC: r = −0.46, p = 0.0028), 129Xe MRI VDP (r = 0.39, p = 0.013), and metrics of small airway disease (CT PRMfSAD: r = 0.55, p = 0.021; Xrs5 Hz: r = −0.44, p = 0.0046, and AX: r = 0.32, p = 0.044). PREFUL-derived VDP is responsive to bronchodilator therapy in asthma and is associated with measures of airflow obstruction and small airway dysfunction. These findings validate PREFUL VDP as a physiologically relevant and accessible ventilation imaging outcome measure in asthma.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,415
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,648

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,065
Tête enseignante GPT0,370
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle