MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391934544 · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.039

Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI to Quantify Ventilation: Feasibility and Physiological Relevance in Severe Asthma

2024· article· en· W4391934544 on OpenAlex
Yonni Friedlander, Samal Munidasa, A. Thakar, Nandhitha Ragunayakam, Carmen Venegas, Melanie Kjarsgaard, Brandon Zanette, Dante P. I. Capaldi, Giles Santyr, Parameswaran Nair, Sarah Svenningsen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Radiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoSt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
FundersCanada Research ChairsTeva Pharmaceutical Industries
KeywordsAsthmaMedicineLungVentilation (architecture)Clinical significanceRelevance (law)Lung ventilationIntensive care medicineRadiologyPathologyInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale and ObjectivesEmergent evidence in several respiratory diseases supports translational potential for Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI to spatially quantify ventilation but its feasibility and physiological relevance have not been demonstrated in patients with asthma. This study compares PREFUL-derived ventilation defect percent (VDP) in severe asthma patients to healthy controls and measures its responsiveness to bronchodilator therapy and relation to established measures of airways disease.Materials and MethodsForty-one adults with severe asthma and seven healthy controls performed same-day free-breathing 1H MRI, 129Xe MRI, spirometry, and oscillometry. A subset of participants (n = 23) performed chest CT and another subset of participants with asthma (n = 19) repeated 1H MRI following the administration of a bronchodilator. VDP was calculated for both PREFUL and 129Xe MRI. Additionally, the percent of functional small airways disease was determined from CT parametric response maps (PRMfSAD).ResultsPREFUL VDP measured pre-bronchodilator (19.1% [7.4–43.3], p = 0.0002) and post-bronchodilator (16.9% [6.1–38.4], p = 0.0007) were significantly greater than that of healthy controls (7.5% [3.7–15.5]) and was significantly decreased post-bronchodilator (from 21.9% [10.1–36.9] to 16.9% [6.1–38.4], p = 0.0053). PREFUL VDP was correlated with spirometry (FEV1%pred: r = −0.46, p = 0.0023; FVC%pred: r = −0.35, p = 0.024, FEV1/FVC: r = −0.46, p = 0.0028), 129Xe MRI VDP (r = 0.39, p = 0.013), and metrics of small airway disease (CT PRMfSAD: r = 0.55, p = 0.021; Xrs5 Hz: r = −0.44, p = 0.0046, and AX: r = 0.32, p = 0.044).ConclusionPREFUL-derived VDP is responsive to bronchodilator therapy in asthma and is associated with measures of airflow obstruction and small airway dysfunction. These findings validate PREFUL VDP as a physiologically relevant and accessible ventilation imaging outcome measure in asthma. Emergent evidence in several respiratory diseases supports translational potential for Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI to spatially quantify ventilation but its feasibility and physiological relevance have not been demonstrated in patients with asthma. This study compares PREFUL-derived ventilation defect percent (VDP) in severe asthma patients to healthy controls and measures its responsiveness to bronchodilator therapy and relation to established measures of airways disease. Forty-one adults with severe asthma and seven healthy controls performed same-day free-breathing 1H MRI, 129Xe MRI, spirometry, and oscillometry. A subset of participants (n = 23) performed chest CT and another subset of participants with asthma (n = 19) repeated 1H MRI following the administration of a bronchodilator. VDP was calculated for both PREFUL and 129Xe MRI. Additionally, the percent of functional small airways disease was determined from CT parametric response maps (PRMfSAD). PREFUL VDP measured pre-bronchodilator (19.1% [7.4–43.3], p = 0.0002) and post-bronchodilator (16.9% [6.1–38.4], p = 0.0007) were significantly greater than that of healthy controls (7.5% [3.7–15.5]) and was significantly decreased post-bronchodilator (from 21.9% [10.1–36.9] to 16.9% [6.1–38.4], p = 0.0053). PREFUL VDP was correlated with spirometry (FEV1%pred: r = −0.46, p = 0.0023; FVC%pred: r = −0.35, p = 0.024, FEV1/FVC: r = −0.46, p = 0.0028), 129Xe MRI VDP (r = 0.39, p = 0.013), and metrics of small airway disease (CT PRMfSAD: r = 0.55, p = 0.021; Xrs5 Hz: r = −0.44, p = 0.0046, and AX: r = 0.32, p = 0.044). PREFUL-derived VDP is responsive to bronchodilator therapy in asthma and is associated with measures of airflow obstruction and small airway dysfunction. These findings validate PREFUL VDP as a physiologically relevant and accessible ventilation imaging outcome measure in asthma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it