The Shadow of a Taxman: Who Funded the Irish Revolution, by R.J.C. Adams
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
R.J.C. Adams begins his book by calling attention to the extensive literature about the history of the Irish War of Independence, traceable at least to Sean O’Casey’s 1923 play The Shadow of a Gunman. However, he notes with some irony that until recently very few scholarly works have focused on ‘who paid for the gun …’ (p. 1) Adams’s book is the most recent of a small number of studies that attempt to explain how the Dáil Éireann government was financed during the almost three years of the Irish Revolution. Adams divides his book into two parts, the first focused on raising revenue within Ireland. Eamon de Valera, now Príomh-Aire, told the Dáil in April 1919, ‘It is obvious that the work of our Government cannot be carried on without funds’, and plans were laid for a National Loan to raise at least £250,000 through the sale of bonds. The appointment of Michael Collins as Minister of Finance was a major contribution to accomplishing this objective. Although largely remembered for his leadership as the director of military operations during the War for Independence, Collins came to his ministerial post as someone with experience in banking matters, having worked for some ten years in London banks and brokerage firms. The National Loan bonds were to be sold in denominations from £1 to £100 and were to pay 5 per cent interest. Adams shows that Collins organised a national campaign to promote sales of the bonds, relying largely on the existing Sinn Féin organisations around the country. Large bond notices were also planned for Irish newspapers, but those newspapers that printed them were suppressed by the British authorities—a gesture that in itself proved to be a conspicuous advertisement for the bonds. British authorities had largely ignored the activities of the Dáil, but tried to stop the sale of the bonds, arresting anyone found with receipts or bond certificates. Adams explains that, despite these punitive measures, Collins was able to enlist the services of commercial banks in Dublin, such as the Hibernian Bank and the Munster & Leinster Bank, to handle deposits and withdrawals with remarkably little cash seized by Crown forces. Adams records that at the close of the National Loan in July 1920 some £355,000 had been received, quoting Arthur Griffith as saying this was ‘one of the most extraordinary feats in the country’s history’ (p. 80). Perhaps even more extraordinary are the conclusions that Adams draws in studying the records of who purchased the bonds. Although farmers constituted roughly 44 per cent of the Irish population, they made up 74 per cent of the subscribers to the National Loan and paid 59 per cent of the cash contributed (pp. 107–9). These figures illustrate the wide popular support for the Dail government in the struggle for independence and particularly its strong rural base, Adams concludes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».