GreenRoofNet: Integrating High-Resolution Aerial Imagery with Deep Learning for Efficient Green Roof Monitoring
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Urban environments are increasingly recognized as both significant contributors to and primary victims of climate change. Buildings in urban settings are responsible for approximately 33% of global greenhouse gas emissions, while cities themselves are often situated on fertile land with high carbon sequestration potential. To mitigate these impacts on climate, adopting nature-based sustainable technologies is essential for developing climate-smart cities. Among these, green roofs have emerged as a critical solution for climate change mitigation.Significance of Green Roofs: Originally designed for stormwater management, green roofs have demonstrated effectiveness in various environmental aspects. They mitigate urban heat island effects, reduce sound and air pollution, lower building energy consumption, enhance biodiversity, and have the potential for carbon sequestration. Recognizing these benefits, Toronto implemented a by-law in 2009 mandating green roofs on all new large buildings with flat roofs larger than 2,000 m², complemented by incentives for the private sector. Despite the increase in green roof installations, there is a lack of efficient monitoring, leading to concerns about maintenance and compliance.Challenges in Monitoring: The absence of an efficient green-roof monitoring system is a widespread problem. Traditional monitoring techniques face limitations, including on-site inspections and satellite imagery analysis. High-resolution satellite data are costly, while freely available images (e.g., from Landsat) lack the necessary resolution for small-scale green roof analysis. This gap highlights the need for an efficient, automated, and accurate green roof monitoring system.Methods: To address this need, we developed an automated, deep-learning-based toolbox (GreenRoofNet) for monitoring green roofs using high-resolution (8 cm) orthoimages collected by the City of Toronto for other purposes. We segmented these images into 299x299 pixel tiles with a 20% overlap to ensure comprehensive coverage, particularly of smaller green roofs. Using 500 labeled images for training and validation, and the remainder for testing, we employed the Inception v4 architecture in TensorFlow. This deep convolutional network model was selected for its ability to extract detailed features crucial for accurate green roof detection. The model training involved a cross-entropy loss function, an Adam optimizer, and a dynamic learning rate, with a 50-epoch limit and early stopping to prevent overfitting. Post-processing of tiles was conducted using maximum confidence scores to amalgamate overlapping detections.Results and Implications: The model has successfully identified green roofs with approximately 95% accuracy and detected their boundaries with about 90% precision. Preliminary analysis reveals that a segment of Toronto's green roofs is undergoing degradation, whereas a substantial proportion remains in good condition, with a smaller segment being currently undetectable or missing. Further testing is underway, with plans to package the results of this project in a web application featuring an open-source map. This tool will play a pivotal role in assessing the effectiveness of the green roof by-law, aiding in the verification of subsidies, guiding the maintenance of green roofs, and facilitating the estimation of their environmental benefits.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».