MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392585445 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-4737

GreenRoofNet: Integrating High-Resolution Aerial Imagery with Deep Learning for Efficient Green Roof Monitoring

2024· preprint· en· W4392585445 on OpenAlexaffabout
Md Abdul Halim, Wenxi Liao, Imrul Kayes, Jennifer Drake, Liat Margolis, Debra Wunch, Sean C. Thomas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerial imageryRemote sensingRoofSuperresolutionComputer scienceDeep learningArtificial intelligenceHigh resolutionComputer visionEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeographyImage (mathematics)Archaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Urban environments are increasingly recognized as both significant contributors to and primary victims of climate change. Buildings in urban settings are responsible for approximately 33% of global greenhouse gas emissions, while cities themselves are often situated on fertile land with high carbon sequestration potential. To mitigate these impacts on climate, adopting nature-based sustainable technologies is essential for developing climate-smart cities. Among these, green roofs have emerged as a critical solution for climate change mitigation.Significance of Green Roofs: Originally designed for stormwater management, green roofs have demonstrated effectiveness in various environmental aspects. They mitigate urban heat island effects, reduce sound and air pollution, lower building energy consumption, enhance biodiversity, and have the potential for carbon sequestration. Recognizing these benefits, Toronto implemented a by-law in 2009 mandating green roofs on all new large buildings with flat roofs larger than 2,000 m², complemented by incentives for the private sector. Despite the increase in green roof installations, there is a lack of efficient monitoring, leading to concerns about maintenance and compliance.Challenges in Monitoring: The absence of an efficient green-roof monitoring system is a widespread problem. Traditional monitoring techniques face limitations, including on-site inspections and satellite imagery analysis. High-resolution satellite data are costly, while freely available images (e.g., from Landsat) lack the necessary resolution for small-scale green roof analysis. This gap highlights the need for an efficient, automated, and accurate green roof monitoring system.Methods: To address this need, we developed an automated, deep-learning-based toolbox (GreenRoofNet) for monitoring green roofs using high-resolution (8 cm) orthoimages collected by the City of Toronto for other purposes. We segmented these images into 299x299 pixel tiles with a 20% overlap to ensure comprehensive coverage, particularly of smaller green roofs. Using 500 labeled images for training and validation, and the remainder for testing, we employed the Inception v4 architecture in TensorFlow. This deep convolutional network model was selected for its ability to extract detailed features crucial for accurate green roof detection. The model training involved a cross-entropy loss function, an Adam optimizer, and a dynamic learning rate, with a 50-epoch limit and early stopping to prevent overfitting. Post-processing of tiles was conducted using maximum confidence scores to amalgamate overlapping detections.Results and Implications: The model has successfully identified green roofs with approximately 95% accuracy and detected their boundaries with about 90% precision. Preliminary analysis reveals that a segment of Toronto's green roofs is undergoing degradation, whereas a substantial proportion remains in good condition, with a smaller segment being currently undetectable or missing. Further testing is underway, with plans to package the results of this project in a web application featuring an open-source map. This tool will play a pivotal role in assessing the effectiveness of the green roof by-law, aiding in the verification of subsidies, guiding the maintenance of green roofs, and facilitating the estimation of their environmental benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications→French-language works237,207→