O33 Longitudinal assessment of biomarkers in NOBILITY, a randomized, phase II clinical trial of obinutuzumab for treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective To investigate changes in peripheral B cells, B-cell subsets and biomarkers in NOBILITY. Methods In the randomized Phase II NOBILITY trial (NCT02550652), patients with lupus nephritis received standard care (MMF) plus obinutuzumab 1000 mg or placebo on Weeks 0, 2, 24 and 26. We analyzed autoantibodies, complement C3/C4, total CD19+ B cells and B-cell subsets using high-sensitivity flow cytometry at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 52, 76 and 104. Sustained B-cell depletion was defined as total B cells below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; 0.4 cells/μL) at Weeks 24 and 52. Detectable B cells were defined as total B cells above LLOQ. Results Baseline biomarker levels were similar between treatment groups. By Week 4, 89.3% (50/56) of obinutuzumab-treated patients had total and all B-cell subsets below LLOQ; by Week 104, 91.8% (45/49) had total B cells above LLOQ. At Week 104, mean memory B cells remained low compared with baseline in obinutuzumab-treated patients (3.5 vs 65 cells/µL), whereas mean naïve B cells were repleted (127 vs 229 cells/µL; figure 1). Of 52 obinutuzumab-treated patients with B-cell measurements at Weeks 24 and 52, 61.5% had sustained B-cell depletion. A trend towards higher renal response rates at Week 76 were observed in obinutuzumab-treated patients with sustained B-cell depletion and those with detectable B cells compared with placebo-treated patients (figure 2). In patients positive for anti-dsDNA antibodies at baseline (>30 IU/mL), median anti-dsDNA antibodies at Week 104 were reduced by 84% and 39% in the obinutuzumab and placebo groups, respectively; anti-C1q antibodies were reduced by 61% and 7%, respectively. Among patients who were hypocomplementemic at baseline (C3 <90 mg/dL or C4 <16 mg/dL), more patients who received obinutuzumab than placebo had normal C3 (75% vs 38%) and C4 (82% vs 31%) levels at Week 52. Conclusion In patients with lupus nephritis, obinutuzumab treatment resulted in robust and sustained reductions in B cells, greater renal response in patients with sustained B-cell depletion and greater improvements in autoantibodies and C3/C4 compared with placebo. These data support the superiority of obinutuzumab plus MMF at inducing renal response. Acknowledgements Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Editorial assistance was provided by Health Interactions, Inc., and funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Disclosures R.A. Furie has received research support and consulting fees from Genentech, Inc. S.W. Tas has received research support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc. A. Malvar has received consulting fees from Genentech, Inc., and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. C.M. Looney, E. Martins, A. Mao and T. Schindler are employees and shareholders of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. H. Raghu, V.G. Anania and J.A. Ross Terres are employees of Genentech, Inc., and shareholders of F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd. E.M. Vital has received consulting fees from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».