O33 Longitudinal assessment of biomarkers in NOBILITY, a randomized, phase II clinical trial of obinutuzumab for treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate changes in peripheral B cells, B-cell subsets and biomarkers in NOBILITY. Methods In the randomized Phase II NOBILITY trial (NCT02550652), patients with lupus nephritis received standard care (MMF) plus obinutuzumab 1000 mg or placebo on Weeks 0, 2, 24 and 26. We analyzed autoantibodies, complement C3/C4, total CD19+ B cells and B-cell subsets using high-sensitivity flow cytometry at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 52, 76 and 104. Sustained B-cell depletion was defined as total B cells below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; 0.4 cells/μL) at Weeks 24 and 52. Detectable B cells were defined as total B cells above LLOQ. Results Baseline biomarker levels were similar between treatment groups. By Week 4, 89.3% (50/56) of obinutuzumab-treated patients had total and all B-cell subsets below LLOQ; by Week 104, 91.8% (45/49) had total B cells above LLOQ. At Week 104, mean memory B cells remained low compared with baseline in obinutuzumab-treated patients (3.5 vs 65 cells/µL), whereas mean naïve B cells were repleted (127 vs 229 cells/µL; figure 1). Of 52 obinutuzumab-treated patients with B-cell measurements at Weeks 24 and 52, 61.5% had sustained B-cell depletion. A trend towards higher renal response rates at Week 76 were observed in obinutuzumab-treated patients with sustained B-cell depletion and those with detectable B cells compared with placebo-treated patients (figure 2). In patients positive for anti-dsDNA antibodies at baseline (>30 IU/mL), median anti-dsDNA antibodies at Week 104 were reduced by 84% and 39% in the obinutuzumab and placebo groups, respectively; anti-C1q antibodies were reduced by 61% and 7%, respectively. Among patients who were hypocomplementemic at baseline (C3 <90 mg/dL or C4 <16 mg/dL), more patients who received obinutuzumab than placebo had normal C3 (75% vs 38%) and C4 (82% vs 31%) levels at Week 52. Conclusion In patients with lupus nephritis, obinutuzumab treatment resulted in robust and sustained reductions in B cells, greater renal response in patients with sustained B-cell depletion and greater improvements in autoantibodies and C3/C4 compared with placebo. These data support the superiority of obinutuzumab plus MMF at inducing renal response. Acknowledgements Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Editorial assistance was provided by Health Interactions, Inc., and funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Disclosures R.A. Furie has received research support and consulting fees from Genentech, Inc. S.W. Tas has received research support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc. A. Malvar has received consulting fees from Genentech, Inc., and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. C.M. Looney, E. Martins, A. Mao and T. Schindler are employees and shareholders of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. H. Raghu, V.G. Anania and J.A. Ross Terres are employees of Genentech, Inc., and shareholders of F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd. E.M. Vital has received consulting fees from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".