MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393064458 · doi:10.1215/00021482-10925339

Wetlands in a Dry Land: More-Than-Human Histories of Australia's Murray-Darling Basin

2024· article· en· W4393064458 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Lander

Notice bibliographique

RevueAgricultural History · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWetlandStructural basinDry landGeographyArchaeologyHydrology (agriculture)FisheryEcologyGeologyBiologyGeomorphologyAgronomy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

O'Gorman explains in the introduction to this book that she went into the archives interested in the politics of water allocation for rice farming and unexpectedly found that much of the documentation concerned the ducks that enjoyed these anthropogenic wetlands. This then led her to think about the ways in which human societies are enmeshed in complex ecosystems with other species, and to explore various case studies about these species. The use of the plural “histories” in the title is quite appropriate since the book is not a single narrative but a series of case studies of different areas far apart from one another.As a Canadian historian of China's wetlands with little knowledge of Australia, I approached this book curious about wet places and the comparative history of Anglo settler colonialism. I am presumably not the only one who knows little about Australia's environmental history, judging from the fact that this is the first work on Australia's environmental history published in either of the two most venerable environmental history book series (by Cambridge and Washington University Presses). The introduction is well designed to convince Australian readers of the importance of approaching the region's history from a multispecies perspective but does not provide ill-informed foreigners like myself with enough background information on Australian geography, history, or historiography. Nonetheless, O'Gorman keeps the focus on the big issues that outsiders can relate to. I found it clear and engaging throughout.The book begins with a chapter on the contemporary politics of weaving. Beginning with a discussion of how Aboriginal women living at the mouth of the river have long used wetland sedges to weave, the chapter moves on to a broader discussion of how women in other regions use weaving as a way of maintaining traditions and building bonds. Unsurprisingly, when officials decide how water is allocated, Aboriginals usually get the short end of the stick, and they are disadvantaged in other ways, such as being prohibited by law for using wetlands for profit (this reminded me of the politics of wild rice cultivation in North America). The connections between Aboriginal people and wetlands remains a theme throughout the book, as does the importance of including them in discussions about wetland management.Chapter 2 focuses on the history of the town of Toowomba, built in the swamps in the upper reaches of the Darling River basin, from the arrival of European colonists in the mid-nineteenth century until the 1930s. The town dealt with flooding, pollution, and mosquitos, and O'Gorman does a good job of situating this history in the broader context of ideas of social regulation and disease in that period. These ideas return in the subsequent chapter, on the concern over malaria in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area during the First and Second World Wars and the anti-mosquito campaigns.The following three chapters focus on birds, and I found them the most enjoyable of the book. While birds in much of the Northern Hemisphere tend to migrate seasonally, the limiting feature of the Australian climate for many birds is not seasonal change but unpredictable longer-term climatic fluctuations, which force them to move where conditions are good at any given time without any fixed pattern. Chapter 4 explores how birds adapted to human modification of wetlands, such as irrigating large areas to grow rice, in the same Murrumbidgee region. The diversion of increasing amounts of water to rice paddies over the course of the twentieth century unsurprisingly attracted many ducks, and this chapter provides a fascinating account of the scientists that researched them, farmers who accused them of eating crops, and the growth of environmental protection in Australia.Chapter 5 explores the history of pelicans at the mouth of the river. European colonists initially slaughtered them as rivals for fish, but they then became a focus for conservation. The next chapter turns to the government itself, showing how international agreements on migratory birds became a key tool of the federal government for protecting wetlands. It is a good study of what types of cultural and administrative factors affect which ecosystems are and are not protected.Like the first chapter, the final one is mostly situated in the present, but it contains an insightful discussion of the uses to which history is put in conservation debates. A large increase in the number of protected seals in the river's estuary has reduced the ability of people to live by fishing there, and the chapter does a good job of considering how workers in an extractive industry (fishing) think about many of the issues discussed in the book. The conclusion correctly emphasizes that the types of histories discussed in the book provide important insights into how Australia's wetlands as they become even more unpredictable as the climate changes.This brief summary does not do justice to the many topics addressed in the book or its many insights, and I would encourage anyone interested in similar issues in other parts of the world—especially Anglo settler colonies—to read it. Despite vast differences of ecology, these regions were all settled as part of the same historical process, and anyone who studies any of them should be aware of what aspects of these processes are shared across space, and which are unique to specific places.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,329
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,933

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAgricultural HistoryMême sujetPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyTravaux en français237 207