MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393064458 · doi:10.1215/00021482-10925339

Wetlands in a Dry Land: More-Than-Human Histories of Australia's Murray-Darling Basin

2024· article· en· W4393064458 on OpenAlex
Brian Lander

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural History · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWetlandStructural basinDry landGeographyArchaeologyHydrology (agriculture)FisheryEcologyGeologyBiologyGeomorphologyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O'Gorman explains in the introduction to this book that she went into the archives interested in the politics of water allocation for rice farming and unexpectedly found that much of the documentation concerned the ducks that enjoyed these anthropogenic wetlands. This then led her to think about the ways in which human societies are enmeshed in complex ecosystems with other species, and to explore various case studies about these species. The use of the plural “histories” in the title is quite appropriate since the book is not a single narrative but a series of case studies of different areas far apart from one another.As a Canadian historian of China's wetlands with little knowledge of Australia, I approached this book curious about wet places and the comparative history of Anglo settler colonialism. I am presumably not the only one who knows little about Australia's environmental history, judging from the fact that this is the first work on Australia's environmental history published in either of the two most venerable environmental history book series (by Cambridge and Washington University Presses). The introduction is well designed to convince Australian readers of the importance of approaching the region's history from a multispecies perspective but does not provide ill-informed foreigners like myself with enough background information on Australian geography, history, or historiography. Nonetheless, O'Gorman keeps the focus on the big issues that outsiders can relate to. I found it clear and engaging throughout.The book begins with a chapter on the contemporary politics of weaving. Beginning with a discussion of how Aboriginal women living at the mouth of the river have long used wetland sedges to weave, the chapter moves on to a broader discussion of how women in other regions use weaving as a way of maintaining traditions and building bonds. Unsurprisingly, when officials decide how water is allocated, Aboriginals usually get the short end of the stick, and they are disadvantaged in other ways, such as being prohibited by law for using wetlands for profit (this reminded me of the politics of wild rice cultivation in North America). The connections between Aboriginal people and wetlands remains a theme throughout the book, as does the importance of including them in discussions about wetland management.Chapter 2 focuses on the history of the town of Toowomba, built in the swamps in the upper reaches of the Darling River basin, from the arrival of European colonists in the mid-nineteenth century until the 1930s. The town dealt with flooding, pollution, and mosquitos, and O'Gorman does a good job of situating this history in the broader context of ideas of social regulation and disease in that period. These ideas return in the subsequent chapter, on the concern over malaria in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area during the First and Second World Wars and the anti-mosquito campaigns.The following three chapters focus on birds, and I found them the most enjoyable of the book. While birds in much of the Northern Hemisphere tend to migrate seasonally, the limiting feature of the Australian climate for many birds is not seasonal change but unpredictable longer-term climatic fluctuations, which force them to move where conditions are good at any given time without any fixed pattern. Chapter 4 explores how birds adapted to human modification of wetlands, such as irrigating large areas to grow rice, in the same Murrumbidgee region. The diversion of increasing amounts of water to rice paddies over the course of the twentieth century unsurprisingly attracted many ducks, and this chapter provides a fascinating account of the scientists that researched them, farmers who accused them of eating crops, and the growth of environmental protection in Australia.Chapter 5 explores the history of pelicans at the mouth of the river. European colonists initially slaughtered them as rivals for fish, but they then became a focus for conservation. The next chapter turns to the government itself, showing how international agreements on migratory birds became a key tool of the federal government for protecting wetlands. It is a good study of what types of cultural and administrative factors affect which ecosystems are and are not protected.Like the first chapter, the final one is mostly situated in the present, but it contains an insightful discussion of the uses to which history is put in conservation debates. A large increase in the number of protected seals in the river's estuary has reduced the ability of people to live by fishing there, and the chapter does a good job of considering how workers in an extractive industry (fishing) think about many of the issues discussed in the book. The conclusion correctly emphasizes that the types of histories discussed in the book provide important insights into how Australia's wetlands as they become even more unpredictable as the climate changes.This brief summary does not do justice to the many topics addressed in the book or its many insights, and I would encourage anyone interested in similar issues in other parts of the world—especially Anglo settler colonies—to read it. Despite vast differences of ecology, these regions were all settled as part of the same historical process, and anyone who studies any of them should be aware of what aspects of these processes are shared across space, and which are unique to specific places.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it