FAMILY EDUCATION IN THE PEASANT FAMILY OF SOUTHERN UKRAINE IN THE 19TH – THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURIES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article considers the practice of raising children in the family of Southern Ukraine in the 19th – the first quarter of the 20th centuries. The author considers it essential and necessary to research the issues of the history of culture as a whole, folk pedagogy in terms of the objectively existing features of individual regions, which differ in the specifics of socio-pedagogical, economic and cultural development. Scientific interest in this context is the South of Ukraine in the 19th - the first quarter of the 20th centuries – an agricultural region, the vast majority of whose population lived in rural areas, had its own ethno-pedagogical views and beliefs, which affected the specifics of raising children, which, in turn, was determined by the methods of management and educational traditions of the family. It is emphasized that the pedagogical discourse of the 19th – the first quarter of the 20th centuries needs a new interpretation. It is this historical period that is an extremely fruitful research field; it is a time of rapid social, political, and economic transformations that changed the traditional Ukrainian family. The author, having considered the main areas of raising children in the peasant family of the South of Ukraine in the 19th - the first quarter of the 20th century, notes that the leading ones were labor, moral and aesthetic education, which were determined by traditional standards of everyday life, behavior, vital arrange, religious ideas, and labor achievements. It is noted that the specificity of raising children in a peasant family of the southern Ukrainian region was determined by the multinationality of its composition. The labor education system in the peasant family was clearly differentiated according to the age and gender characteristics of the child. The issue of labor education became especially relevant in the steppe southern agricultural region, where children were taught to work in the fields from childhood. This is the difference between this direction of educational influence, if we compare the Black Sea provinces with the Northern Ukrainian ones. The most effective method of labor education in a peasant family was the example of elders. Church holidays were an effective means of moral education. The celebrations of Christmas Eve, Christmas, and Easter were specific for the South of Ukraine. Aesthetic education was the determining direction for the Ukrainian peasant family. The family was the main motive that directed the consciousness, will and feelings of children in accordance with the pedagogical experience and the parents’ culture, their family traditions and a sense of duty towards those who live nearby. The source of aesthetic education was Ukrainian folklore.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».