MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393326824 · doi:10.2979/vic.00034

Explorations in the Icy North: How Travel Narratives Shaped Arctic Science in the Nineteenth Century by Nanna Katrine Lüders Kaalund (review)

2023· article· en· W4393326824 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeArcticThe arcticAstrobiologyHistoryArtLiteratureGeologyOceanographyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Explorations in the Icy North: How Travel Narratives Shaped Arctic Science in the Nineteenth Century by Nanna Katrine Lüders Kaalund Hester Blum (bio) Explorations in the Icy North: How Travel Narratives Shaped Arctic Science in the Nineteenth Century, by Nanna Katrine Lüders Kaalund; pp. x + 230. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2021, $40.00, $38.00 ebook. Explorations in the Icy North: How Travel Narratives Shaped Arctic Science in the Nineteenth Century is interested in how the scientific outcomes of Arctic exploration were variably communicated within the narrative accounts of the voyages of British, Danish, and American expeditions in the nineteenth century. In Nanna Katrine Lüders Kaalund's telling, the accuracy and authority of the scientific information transmitted by these expeditionary narratives hinged on the credibility of their authors. Kaalund analyzes how polar expeditionary accounts presented their scientific findings, whether incidental or commissioned, and describes the criteria with which readers gauged the authority of such accounts; expeditionary integrity, Kaalund nicely argues, was contingent in part on the tables, charts, illustrations, and appendices often included in published voyage narratives. The trustworthiness of white explorers was also shaped by their class standing and to some extent by the degree to which they did (or more usually, did not) heed Inuit Indigenous knowledge. [End Page 531] In her engagement with Inuit knowledge and with the texts and histories of Danish settlement in Greenland (in addition to the more familiar British, Norwegian, and American expeditions to the Canadian Arctic), Kaalund brings a welcome new perspective to a topic that is usually approached through monolingual sources. One notable aspect of the book is that its own narrative arc takes readers from early nineteenth-century British Northwest Passage attempts—a common starting point for expeditionary histories—to the First International Polar Year (IPY, 1882–83), not generally the telos of such scholarship. The IPY was a year-long period of intensive collaborative international Arctic research (subsequent IPYs included Antarctica), and Kaalund argues that the twelve-nation initiative marked a shift in attitudes toward polar exploration: from nationalist and imperial projects to more globalized scientific attention to the North. "Nineteenth-century Arctic science was inherently transnational in nature," Kaalund writes astutely; "explorers from different nations read and commented upon each other's narratives, and expeditions often included participants from other countries, including Indigenous peoples encountered or employed when there" (131). In the seventy or so years of Arctic exploration included in this book's timeline, scores of expeditions by Europeans and Americans voyaged north, although scientific research was not necessarily the primary driver of such ventures. Kaalund's interest in the IPY delimits a potentially compelling, more compressed time frame for study of nineteenth-century Arctic voyaging, which usually extends to the early twentieth-century attempts to reach the North Pole by Americans Matthew Henson and Robert Peary, or Norwegian Roald Amundsen's completion of the Northwest Passage. Yet this book's promise of focused inquiry into how narrative writing practices shaped nineteenth-century Arctic science—an ambitious promise, to be sure—winds up more unresolved than fulfilled. Kaalund's claims are striking, such as when she writes that the textual and visual representations of scientific practices in the Arctic were "negotiated as their own genre" (62). The volume misses an opportunity, however, to provide a particularly informed account of how such a genre operated and how it could be differentiated from other forms of expeditionary or travel writing. In fact, Kaalund states at the book's outset that her definitions of terms such as "explorer," "narrative of exploration," and "travel literature" are broad and overlapping if not interchangeable (6). This is unfortunate. The figures of the explorer and the traveler did not signify the same thing historically, even if both figures were often animated by colonialist energies, and there are important differences between the genres of travel literature, expeditionary writing, or personal narratives. Precision with such terms would benefit a study that is interested in the various forms of authority that can be conveyed by a text. This attention would also help to illuminate the reception differences between the narrative of the widely traveled Greenlandic Inuk Suersaq (writing under the name...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,999
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,072

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,105
Tête enseignante GPT0,409
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian StudiesMême sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207