MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393692420 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7750145

Potential power scenario for solar, wind and hydropower in Europe

2023· dataset· en· W4393692420 sur OpenAlexaff
Anders Wörman

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueRenewable energy and sustainable power systems
Établissements canadiensRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHydropowerWind powerEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyPower (physics)GeographyElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Data for power scenario used to assess climate impact on solar, wind and hydropower over a 35-year historical period. Structure and content of data repository Here, we provide information on the data used in the investigation of the scientific article "Continental complementarity of renewable energy mixes" by Wörman et al., Nature Communications Engineering. Hydro-climatic data was obtained from the Copernicus ECMWF database for an area of 13 106 km2 covering most parts of Europe and the Middle East. The hydropower potential was calculated at the locations of hydropower stations included in the GranD data base (Beams et al., 2019). Runoff was calculated based on the E-HEPE model (Hundecha et al., 2016) and this was used to estimate the hydropower potential at station locations (Wörman et al., 2017) and to generalize these values to 362 of totally 1,055 uniformly distributed sub-areas covering Europe (see figure below). The primary data used to derive the hydropower data contained in this repository is available at this link: Virtual Energy Storage – Hydropower, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3706758 Daily data of the Surface Solar Radiation Downwards (SSRD) from 01-01-1979 to 31-12-2020 was obtained from Copernicus ECMWF database and converted to radiation incident on a fixed, south-facing panel with an inclination equal to the latitude and, further, covered to PV power potential according to Huld et al (2011, 2015). The power potential was averaged over 24 hours (both night and day) under consideration of changes in the solar elevation and azimuth angles as well as aggregated for 995 of the 1,055 sub-areas. A data report is available in catalogue 4. Meteorological data with the relevance to wind power potential was obtained from ERA5, a reanalysis product of the ECMWF's General Circulation Model available in the Copernicus Climate Data Store. For comparison, data was also taken from Merra 2 and JRA 55 and used to derive wind speed time-series from 01/01/1979 till 31/12/2019 at the location of 20,010 onshore wind farms from the "World Wind Farm Database". The primary data used to derive the solar PV power data contained in this repository is available in catalogue 4 of this repository. The primary data used to derive the wind power data contained in this repository is available at this link: Virtual Energy Storage - Wind power, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7749150 The data representing power scenarios for solar, wind and hydropower are structured in five folders sharing information on different variables and their physiographic characteristics. A ReadMe file is provided in each folder to describe the format of every file: 1. Temporal mean power for solar-wind-hydro at 1,055 areas This folder provides the mean power for the three renewable sources with the following geographical division (Mean_Hydro, Mean_Solar, Mean_Wind). This catalogue also contains information on area id referring to the geographical data files as well as area values and coordinates (ReadMe_mean power CSV). 2. Geographical data This folder contains the following sub-folders and information: Shape files for the 1,055 areas depicted above (shapefile_solar_domain) Shape file of Europe and parts of the Middle East including different nations (Europe_Shapefile) An Excel file with geodata för the 1,055 areas (areas_points_land) 3. GranD_Hydropower time-series This folder contains the following sub-folders and information: A ReadMe file Temporal mean values of potential hydropower production estimated at GranD hydropower stations (Temporal mean values) Linear scaling of the above time-series to match the reported national annual mean hydropower production 4. Solar power_Time-series_Excel This folder contains the following files: A data report describing how Copernicus ERA5 data has been used to estimate solar radiation density and conversion to panel power for different panel types (Readme_Accessing_Solar_Data) Excel sheets with power density time series for the incident solar radiation (cSolarTimeSeries_ssrd24.xlsx) and two panel types (cSolarTimeSeries_ssrd24, cSolarTimeSeries_CdTe24). The values represents 24h averages. 5. Time-series of 1055 regions This folder contains the daily time-series used in a full assessment of solar, wind and hydropower system based on the above solar power, wind power and hydropower. A readme file is also provided. Various information, including electric consumption data Data on electric consumption extracted on 25/10/2022 13:35:55 from [ESTAT] Matlab file used to derive average monthly consumption pattern based on 6a) Energy storage capacity in Euopean Hydropower according to data collected by Prof. em. Killingtveit. National hydropower production used to scale hydropower estimated at GranD stations to the national production level Simulation results used for Figure 3 6. Various information including electric consumption References Beames at al., 2019. Global Reservoir and dam (GRanD) Database: technical documentation – version 1.3. February 2019. http://globaldamwatch.org Huld, T. and Ana M.G. Amillo. Estimating PV Module Performance over Large Geographical Regions: The Role of Irradiance, Air Temperature, Wind Speed and Solar Spectrum. In: Energies 8 (2015), pp. 5159{5181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en8065159. Huld, T.A.; Friesen, G.; Skoczek, A.; Kenny, R.A.; Sample, T.; Field, M.; Dunlop, E.D. A, power-rating model for crystalline silicon PV modules. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2011, 95, 3359–3369. Hundecha, Y., Arheimer, B., Donnelly, C. and Pechlivanidis, I.: A regional parameter estimation scheme for a pan-European multi-basin model, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 6(Supplement C), 90–111, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.04.002, 2016. Wörman, A., Lindström, G., Riml, J., 2017. "The Power of Runoff", J. Hydrology, 548(2017): 784-793, dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.041

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetRenewable energy and sustainable power systemsTravaux en français237 207