MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393692420 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7750145

Potential power scenario for solar, wind and hydropower in Europe

2023· dataset· en· W4393692420 on OpenAlexaff
Anders Wörman

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicRenewable energy and sustainable power systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydropowerWind powerEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyPower (physics)GeographyElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data for power scenario used to assess climate impact on solar, wind and hydropower over a 35-year historical period. Structure and content of data repository Here, we provide information on the data used in the investigation of the scientific article "Continental complementarity of renewable energy mixes" by Wörman et al., Nature Communications Engineering. Hydro-climatic data was obtained from the Copernicus ECMWF database for an area of 13 106 km2 covering most parts of Europe and the Middle East. The hydropower potential was calculated at the locations of hydropower stations included in the GranD data base (Beams et al., 2019). Runoff was calculated based on the E-HEPE model (Hundecha et al., 2016) and this was used to estimate the hydropower potential at station locations (Wörman et al., 2017) and to generalize these values to 362 of totally 1,055 uniformly distributed sub-areas covering Europe (see figure below). The primary data used to derive the hydropower data contained in this repository is available at this link: Virtual Energy Storage – Hydropower, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3706758 Daily data of the Surface Solar Radiation Downwards (SSRD) from 01-01-1979 to 31-12-2020 was obtained from Copernicus ECMWF database and converted to radiation incident on a fixed, south-facing panel with an inclination equal to the latitude and, further, covered to PV power potential according to Huld et al (2011, 2015). The power potential was averaged over 24 hours (both night and day) under consideration of changes in the solar elevation and azimuth angles as well as aggregated for 995 of the 1,055 sub-areas. A data report is available in catalogue 4. Meteorological data with the relevance to wind power potential was obtained from ERA5, a reanalysis product of the ECMWF's General Circulation Model available in the Copernicus Climate Data Store. For comparison, data was also taken from Merra 2 and JRA 55 and used to derive wind speed time-series from 01/01/1979 till 31/12/2019 at the location of 20,010 onshore wind farms from the "World Wind Farm Database". The primary data used to derive the solar PV power data contained in this repository is available in catalogue 4 of this repository. The primary data used to derive the wind power data contained in this repository is available at this link: Virtual Energy Storage - Wind power, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7749150 The data representing power scenarios for solar, wind and hydropower are structured in five folders sharing information on different variables and their physiographic characteristics. A ReadMe file is provided in each folder to describe the format of every file: 1. Temporal mean power for solar-wind-hydro at 1,055 areas This folder provides the mean power for the three renewable sources with the following geographical division (Mean_Hydro, Mean_Solar, Mean_Wind). This catalogue also contains information on area id referring to the geographical data files as well as area values and coordinates (ReadMe_mean power CSV). 2. Geographical data This folder contains the following sub-folders and information: Shape files for the 1,055 areas depicted above (shapefile_solar_domain) Shape file of Europe and parts of the Middle East including different nations (Europe_Shapefile) An Excel file with geodata för the 1,055 areas (areas_points_land) 3. GranD_Hydropower time-series This folder contains the following sub-folders and information: A ReadMe file Temporal mean values of potential hydropower production estimated at GranD hydropower stations (Temporal mean values) Linear scaling of the above time-series to match the reported national annual mean hydropower production 4. Solar power_Time-series_Excel This folder contains the following files: A data report describing how Copernicus ERA5 data has been used to estimate solar radiation density and conversion to panel power for different panel types (Readme_Accessing_Solar_Data) Excel sheets with power density time series for the incident solar radiation (cSolarTimeSeries_ssrd24.xlsx) and two panel types (cSolarTimeSeries_ssrd24, cSolarTimeSeries_CdTe24). The values represents 24h averages. 5. Time-series of 1055 regions This folder contains the daily time-series used in a full assessment of solar, wind and hydropower system based on the above solar power, wind power and hydropower. A readme file is also provided. Various information, including electric consumption data Data on electric consumption extracted on 25/10/2022 13:35:55 from [ESTAT] Matlab file used to derive average monthly consumption pattern based on 6a) Energy storage capacity in Euopean Hydropower according to data collected by Prof. em. Killingtveit. National hydropower production used to scale hydropower estimated at GranD stations to the national production level Simulation results used for Figure 3 6. Various information including electric consumption References Beames at al., 2019. Global Reservoir and dam (GRanD) Database: technical documentation – version 1.3. February 2019. http://globaldamwatch.org Huld, T. and Ana M.G. Amillo. Estimating PV Module Performance over Large Geographical Regions: The Role of Irradiance, Air Temperature, Wind Speed and Solar Spectrum. In: Energies 8 (2015), pp. 5159{5181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en8065159. Huld, T.A.; Friesen, G.; Skoczek, A.; Kenny, R.A.; Sample, T.; Field, M.; Dunlop, E.D. A, power-rating model for crystalline silicon PV modules. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2011, 95, 3359–3369. Hundecha, Y., Arheimer, B., Donnelly, C. and Pechlivanidis, I.: A regional parameter estimation scheme for a pan-European multi-basin model, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 6(Supplement C), 90–111, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.04.002, 2016. Wörman, A., Lindström, G., Riml, J., 2017. "The Power of Runoff", J. Hydrology, 548(2017): 784-793, dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.041

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicRenewable energy and sustainable power systemsFrench-language works237,207