Lucrece and Brutus: Glory in the Land of Tender ed. by Madeleine de Scudéry (review)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Lucrece and Brutus: Glory in the Land of Tender ed. by Madeleine de Scudéry Anne E. Duggan Madeleine de Scudéry, Lucrece and Brutus: Glory in the Land of Tender, ed. and trans. Sharon Diane Nell (Toronto: Iter, 2022). Pp. 365; 1 map. $60.95 paper. While many early modern scholars and teachers are aware of Madeleine de Scudéry's second roman à fleuve, Clélie, Histoire Romaine (1654–1660), and the Map of the Land of Tender embedded within it, they may be less familiar with the novel's representation of the story of Lucretia. As Sharon Diane Nell's critical edition and translation of the story of Lucrece and Brutus makes clear, this secondary story is foundational to the novel itself in the way that it supports the novel's progression from captivity—Rome, Brutus's reason, and Clelie are captives of Tarquin's tyranny—towards freedom. The edition also richly weaves the text within Scudéry's lifelong engagement in exploring the figure of Lucretia and the notions of friendship, love, and glory. Lucrece and Brutus: Glory in the Land of Tender is required reading for anyone interested in understanding the complexity of Scudéry's literary talents and philosophical ideas. The critical edition provides material for the uninitiated as well as the expert to explore the centrality of the story of Lucrece and Brutus within the larger framework of Clélie, a novel that is framed by the trials and tribulations of Clelie and her beloved, Aronce, within the context of Roman history and the establishment of the first Roman Republic. In the introduction, Nell initiates readers into the world of seventeenth-century salons and Scudéry's place within it, providing the romancière's biography and presenting her important legacy that is often not adequately accounted for. Nell traces the influences of Scudéry on Marie-Madeleine de La Fayette's The Princess of Cleves (1678), notably the garden scenes with the Duc de Nemours; Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve's Belle et la Bête (1740), where the Beast's magically inspired stupidity recalls Brutus's feigned stupidity; Jacques Rochette de la Morlière's Angola (1746); Jean-Jacques Rousseau; and François-René de Chateaubriand, among others. Nell foregrounds the connections between salon culture and Scudéry's oeuvre, and how Scudéry's text fits into and engages with the literary field of seventeenth-century France with respect to representations of women, preciosity, and the backlash against preciosity by the likes of Nicolas Boileau, Molière, Tallemant des Réaux, and Michel de Pure. The introduction also provides a nice overview of Scudéry reception and criticism. Nell first shows how nineteenth-century literary historians like Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve and Victor Cousin based their knowledge about Scudéry's salon and oeuvre on the works of her detractors. Such a move denigrates the activities—the seriousness—of her salon and the literary value of her texts, which amounts to writing her out of literary history. Nell then focuses on the reassessment of her legacy, which began in the 1970s, by scholars like Dorothy Backer, Carolyn Lougee, and Ian Maclean, stretching into the 1990s and early 2000s with Joan DeJean, Linda Timmermans, and Faith Beasley. The rest of the volume consists of introductions to relevant excerpts (within and outside of Clélie) that support our understanding of the story of Lucrece and Brutus, including Scudéry's longtime interest in the figure of Lucretia. The story itself is quite lengthy—some 200 pages—and includes Nell's introductions to different parts of the narrative that provide context and a framework for reading. This organization works tremendously well in supplying sufficient context for helping [End Page 400] the reader understand the relation, for instance, between the Map of the Land of Tender, which Clelie generated for her friends, and the events surrounding the story of Lucrece. The excerpted texts follow the chronology of Scudéry's publications, showing readers the evolution of her ideas on the figure of Lucretia and on themes such as glory, love, and friendship. Before moving to Clélie, Nell provides two excerpts from Scud...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle