Abstract CT207: Association of gene expression profiles and clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-629
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity for both locally advanced (LA) and recurrent or metastatic (R/M) cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in the phase 2 KEYNOTE-629 trial (NCT03284424). cSCC has high immunogenicity driven by a high tumor mutational burden and it is of interest to determine if the 18-gene T-cell inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP) and a set of other signatures relevant to the tumor microenvironment are associated with response to treatment. This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the association between GEP signatures and clinical outcomes in patients (pts) treated with pembro in KEYNOTE-629. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed LA or R/M cSCC, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS 0 or 1 received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W ≤35 cycles. Association between TcellinfGEP by RNAseq with clinical response (objective response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) to pembro, and association between a set of additional consensus signatures with clinical response to pembro adjusted for TcellinfGEP were evaluated. Significance of GEP signatures was prespecified at 0.05 for 1-sided P values from logistic (ORR) and Cox proportional hazard regression (PFS, OS) adjusted for ECOG PS. Additional assessments included TcellinfGEP AUC or Harrell’s C-index in predicting response to pembro. Results: Of 159 pts, 143 (n = 52, LA cSCC; n = 91, R/M cSCC) had RNAseq samples available for analysis. Of 143 pts, 33.6 % had a TcellinfGEP <1st tertile and 66.4% had a TcellinfGEP ≥1st tertile. TcellinfGEP was significantly associated with improved ORR (P = 0.040) but not PFS (P = 0.087) or OS (P = 0.709). None of the 10 other consensus signatures were significantly associated with clinical outcomes after adjusting for TcellinfGEP and multiplicity (P > 0.05). AUC of TcellinfGEP was moderately predictive of ORR (0.61, 95% CI, 0.51-0.70). Harrell’s C-index of TcellinfGEP was moderately predictive of PFS (0.57, 95% CI 0.51-0.63), and duration of response (0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.73), but not predictive of OS (0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.57). Median PFS (95% CI) was 4.1 mo (1.4-9.8) for the TcellinfGEP <1st tertile subgroup and 8.5 mo (5.5-21.0) for TcellinfGEP ≥1st tertile subgroup. Median OS (95% CI) for the TcellinfGEP <1st tertile subgroup was 25.1 mo (11.4-NR) and 21.0 mo (15.8-29.8) for the TcellinfGEP ≥1st tertile subgroup. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of KEYNOTE-629, Tcellinf GEP was associated with tumor objective response to pembro, but was not clearly associated with longer survival in pts with LA or R/M cSCC treated with pembro. While definitive conclusions require more analyses, these findings provide additional support for TcellinfGEP as a predictive biomarker for cSCC. Citation Format: Åse Bratland, Jean-Jacques Grob, Eva Munoz Couselo, Laurent Mortier, Ralf Gutzmer, Osama Roshdy, Rene Mendoza Gonzalez, Jacob Schachter, Ana M. Arance Fernandez, Florent Grange, Nicolas Meyer, Abhishek J. Joshi, Salem Billan, Judong Shen, Razvan Cristescu, Michael Nebozhyn, Andrey Loboda, Jason Sparkowski, Burak Gumuscu, Jianda Yuan, Brett Hughes. Association of gene expression profiles and clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-629 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT207.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».