MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4395040325 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2023.a925224

Yellow Nineties 2.0 (1890s.ca) by Lorraine Janzen Kooistra (review)

2023· article· en· W4395040325 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kathryn J. Holland

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePublishing and Scholarly Communication
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Yellow Nineties 2.0 (1890s.ca) by Lorraine Janzen Kooistra Kathryn Holland (bio) Yellow Nineties 2.0 (1890s.ca) directed by Lorraine Janzen Kooistra Little magazines hold a particular allure as representatives of fin-desiècle print culture. Through such features as prices, design, and publication schedules, such periodicals pushed their first readers' expectations for the genre's balance of "materiality and immateriality, ephemerality and permanence" (Chapman 147). They have remained far from disposable, with legacies of form and content extended across decades. They belong, for instance, to a network of exchange also populated by modernist magazines attentive to them if not their direct heirs. John Lane, the publisher of several little magazines, highlighted its titles for readers, not despite but because of the conflicts editors and writers developed with those who came before. Lane advertised The Yellow Book on an inside cover of BLAST and nestled advertisements for both in the back cover of Form, first released in 1916, less than a year after BLAST folded (Binckes 7). Looking back on the establishment of the English Review from the vantage point of his 1921 memoir, Ford Madox Ford recalls his aim to launch "an aube-de-siècle Yellow Book," while Margaret Anderson wrote, in 1930, about factors in her decision to produce the Little Review despite financial risks. When friends offered the cost of producing the Yellow Book as a cautionary example, she replied, "Well, yes, look at the 'Yellow Book.' You can look at it on the shelves of almost any book lover, richly bound, and rated among his more precious possessions" (qtd. in Binckes 46–47). Yellow Nineties 2.0, the current phase of the open-access resource originally launched as The Yellow Nineties Online, brings swaths of periodical culture to life for researchers and students. Originally established by Lorraine Janzen Kooistra and Dennis Denisoff, with research teams based primarily at Toronto Metropolitan University, the first phase of this digital humanities (DH) project focused on the development of editions of The Pagan's sole issue (1892) and the thirteen-volume run of the Yellow Book (1894–97). Following this, it has grown via a more sophisticated interface, scholarship on its sources' contributors, and digital editions of the full runs of The Dial, The Evergreen: A Northern Seasonal, The Green Sheaf, The Savoy, and The Venture: An Annual of Art and Literature, which together span 1892–1905. Alongside the site's Magazine Rack are its Database of Ornament, sharing and describing such textual features as headpieces, colophons, and borders; Biographies, a collection of essays about nearly one hundred authors and artists involved in the magazines' creation, written by scholars in and beyond the project; and the Yellow Nineties Personography, an affiliated initiative whose dataset identifies roles and relationships among contributors to the magazines. By remediating its eight central subjects and their systems of production and reception in its digital archive, (virtually) placing these primary texts in users' hands along [End Page 163] with expert commentary and tools for exploration, the project offers an effective argument about the little magazine as a vital, wide-ranging medium for late-Victorian messages. The interface is striking and informative throughout, facilitating users' meaningful explorations of the resource regardless of their levels of familiarity with digital scholarship. Issues of the little magazines and their textual ornaments are the most visually remarkable items on the site. But before encountering them, we are swiftly drawn in to the visual culture of the late 1800s via the homepage's background image, a sepia photo capturing a bustling city scene, with a streetlight and buses with advertisements for Kodak, Nestle, and Quaker Oats in its foreground; headers comprising cropped versions of a graphite portrait of Max Beerbohm and Henry Treffry Dunn's watercolour D.G. Rossetti and Theodore Watts-Dunton in the Sitting Room at Cheyne Walk; and Art Nouveau decorative initial letters structuring the Biographies' alphabetical index. Multiple versions of each magazine issue are available, leveraging features of digital publication that users can wield efficiently. HMTL versions of The Savoy, for instance, include links that enable connections not only between issues' tables of content and specific articles but also to other sections...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,125
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationTravaux en français237 207