MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395040325 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2023.a925224

Yellow Nineties 2.0 (1890s.ca) by Lorraine Janzen Kooistra (review)

2023· article· en· W4395040325 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kathryn J. Holland

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPublishing and Scholarly Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Yellow Nineties 2.0 (1890s.ca) by Lorraine Janzen Kooistra Kathryn Holland (bio) Yellow Nineties 2.0 (1890s.ca) directed by Lorraine Janzen Kooistra Little magazines hold a particular allure as representatives of fin-desiècle print culture. Through such features as prices, design, and publication schedules, such periodicals pushed their first readers' expectations for the genre's balance of "materiality and immateriality, ephemerality and permanence" (Chapman 147). They have remained far from disposable, with legacies of form and content extended across decades. They belong, for instance, to a network of exchange also populated by modernist magazines attentive to them if not their direct heirs. John Lane, the publisher of several little magazines, highlighted its titles for readers, not despite but because of the conflicts editors and writers developed with those who came before. Lane advertised The Yellow Book on an inside cover of BLAST and nestled advertisements for both in the back cover of Form, first released in 1916, less than a year after BLAST folded (Binckes 7). Looking back on the establishment of the English Review from the vantage point of his 1921 memoir, Ford Madox Ford recalls his aim to launch "an aube-de-siècle Yellow Book," while Margaret Anderson wrote, in 1930, about factors in her decision to produce the Little Review despite financial risks. When friends offered the cost of producing the Yellow Book as a cautionary example, she replied, "Well, yes, look at the 'Yellow Book.' You can look at it on the shelves of almost any book lover, richly bound, and rated among his more precious possessions" (qtd. in Binckes 46–47). Yellow Nineties 2.0, the current phase of the open-access resource originally launched as The Yellow Nineties Online, brings swaths of periodical culture to life for researchers and students. Originally established by Lorraine Janzen Kooistra and Dennis Denisoff, with research teams based primarily at Toronto Metropolitan University, the first phase of this digital humanities (DH) project focused on the development of editions of The Pagan's sole issue (1892) and the thirteen-volume run of the Yellow Book (1894–97). Following this, it has grown via a more sophisticated interface, scholarship on its sources' contributors, and digital editions of the full runs of The Dial, The Evergreen: A Northern Seasonal, The Green Sheaf, The Savoy, and The Venture: An Annual of Art and Literature, which together span 1892–1905. Alongside the site's Magazine Rack are its Database of Ornament, sharing and describing such textual features as headpieces, colophons, and borders; Biographies, a collection of essays about nearly one hundred authors and artists involved in the magazines' creation, written by scholars in and beyond the project; and the Yellow Nineties Personography, an affiliated initiative whose dataset identifies roles and relationships among contributors to the magazines. By remediating its eight central subjects and their systems of production and reception in its digital archive, (virtually) placing these primary texts in users' hands along [End Page 163] with expert commentary and tools for exploration, the project offers an effective argument about the little magazine as a vital, wide-ranging medium for late-Victorian messages. The interface is striking and informative throughout, facilitating users' meaningful explorations of the resource regardless of their levels of familiarity with digital scholarship. Issues of the little magazines and their textual ornaments are the most visually remarkable items on the site. But before encountering them, we are swiftly drawn in to the visual culture of the late 1800s via the homepage's background image, a sepia photo capturing a bustling city scene, with a streetlight and buses with advertisements for Kodak, Nestle, and Quaker Oats in its foreground; headers comprising cropped versions of a graphite portrait of Max Beerbohm and Henry Treffry Dunn's watercolour D.G. Rossetti and Theodore Watts-Dunton in the Sitting Room at Cheyne Walk; and Art Nouveau decorative initial letters structuring the Biographies' alphabetical index. Multiple versions of each magazine issue are available, leveraging features of digital publication that users can wield efficiently. HMTL versions of The Savoy, for instance, include links that enable connections not only between issues' tables of content and specific articles but also to other sections...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationFrench-language works237,207