MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4395453803 · doi:10.1353/gpr.2023.a925339

Under the Nakba Tree: Fragments of a Palestinian Family in Canada by Mowafa Said Househ (review)

2023· article· en· W4395453803 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grace Brandt

Notice bibliographique

RevueGreat Plains research · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTree (set theory)Family treeGeographyGenealogyHistoryMathematicsCombinatorics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Under the Nakba Tree: Fragments of a Palestinian Family in Canada by Mowafa Said Househ Grace Brandt Under the Nakba Tree: Fragments of a Palestinian Family in Canada. By Mowafa Said Househ. Athabasca, AB: Athabasca University Press, 2022. 216 pp. CAD$24.99 paper. Under the Nakba Tree: Fragments of a Palestinian Family in Canada, by Mowafa Said Househ, paints a raw account of Palestinian identity through a collection of family and personal vignettes, memories, and stories. Beginning with the invasion by Israeli Defense Forces into Palestine in 1948 and the subsequent expulsion of Palestinians, followed by the First Intifada and the Gulf Wars, and concluding with Househ's own travels throughout his ancestral homelands, Under the Nakba Tree takes the reader through the turmoil and upheaval that reverberated throughout the Middle East to Canada. Househ centers his memoir around two questions: What makes a home and where is home? These questions allow Househ to center his narrative around larger themes of displacement, separation, solidarity, and survival. Househ poignantly describes the racism, prejudice, and social othering experienced by Palestinians and other Middle Eastern groups who settled in Canada during in the latter half of the twentieth century. In chapter 10 Househ unpacks the media portrayals of Arab Muslims in Canada. He contrasts the physical violence committed against Arab Muslims with the simultaneous social disregard by stating, "What many people in our targeted community found just as frightening as the actual violence, was the silence. We were either too visible, and a target, or we were invisible, becoming mere shadows, or nothing" (100–101). Deemed outsiders and targets by their Canadian communities, Househ and his fellow Middle Easterners became subjects of a pan-Arabism that would soon sweep the community at the turn of the twenty-first century. Drawing on personal and family experiences to further contextualize international events, Househ works to construct a body of primary sources through stories told by his father and mother, as well as stories he personally lived. The work is acutely reflective of Househ's individual actions and attitudes throughout his life, as well as the decisions and opinions of the Arab Muslim communities in Jordan and Canada. By structuring the book into four parts—the four cardinal directions—Househ highlights the importance of direction and location throughout the immigrations and exiles he and his family experienced during several lifetimes. The book is also nonlinear at times, which reinforces Househ's perception of time when he claims, "Time is fluid when you live in the immediate state of exile and memory" (25). Househ uses his father's stories in a twofold manner: to break the chronological structure of the text and to reinforce the larger shared experience of exile and solidarity in Jordan and Canada. Mowafa Said Househ provides an intriguing narrative with an engaging structure that is clearly a significant contribution to a growing body of literature and research surrounding the life experiences and worldviews of Palestinians. However, the work leaves readers wondering what larger roles women had in different environments—refugee camps, Canadian communities, mosques, schools, and businesses. Grace Brandt Department of History University of South Dakota Copyright © 2024 Center for Great Plains Studies

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,186
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,344

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,130
Tête enseignante GPT0,379
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGreat Plains researchMême sujetJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesTravaux en français237 207