MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395453803 · doi:10.1353/gpr.2023.a925339

Under the Nakba Tree: Fragments of a Palestinian Family in Canada by Mowafa Said Househ (review)

2023· article· en· W4395453803 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grace Brandt

Bibliographic record

VenueGreat Plains research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTree (set theory)Family treeGeographyGenealogyHistoryMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Under the Nakba Tree: Fragments of a Palestinian Family in Canada by Mowafa Said Househ Grace Brandt Under the Nakba Tree: Fragments of a Palestinian Family in Canada. By Mowafa Said Househ. Athabasca, AB: Athabasca University Press, 2022. 216 pp. CAD$24.99 paper. Under the Nakba Tree: Fragments of a Palestinian Family in Canada, by Mowafa Said Househ, paints a raw account of Palestinian identity through a collection of family and personal vignettes, memories, and stories. Beginning with the invasion by Israeli Defense Forces into Palestine in 1948 and the subsequent expulsion of Palestinians, followed by the First Intifada and the Gulf Wars, and concluding with Househ's own travels throughout his ancestral homelands, Under the Nakba Tree takes the reader through the turmoil and upheaval that reverberated throughout the Middle East to Canada. Househ centers his memoir around two questions: What makes a home and where is home? These questions allow Househ to center his narrative around larger themes of displacement, separation, solidarity, and survival. Househ poignantly describes the racism, prejudice, and social othering experienced by Palestinians and other Middle Eastern groups who settled in Canada during in the latter half of the twentieth century. In chapter 10 Househ unpacks the media portrayals of Arab Muslims in Canada. He contrasts the physical violence committed against Arab Muslims with the simultaneous social disregard by stating, "What many people in our targeted community found just as frightening as the actual violence, was the silence. We were either too visible, and a target, or we were invisible, becoming mere shadows, or nothing" (100–101). Deemed outsiders and targets by their Canadian communities, Househ and his fellow Middle Easterners became subjects of a pan-Arabism that would soon sweep the community at the turn of the twenty-first century. Drawing on personal and family experiences to further contextualize international events, Househ works to construct a body of primary sources through stories told by his father and mother, as well as stories he personally lived. The work is acutely reflective of Househ's individual actions and attitudes throughout his life, as well as the decisions and opinions of the Arab Muslim communities in Jordan and Canada. By structuring the book into four parts—the four cardinal directions—Househ highlights the importance of direction and location throughout the immigrations and exiles he and his family experienced during several lifetimes. The book is also nonlinear at times, which reinforces Househ's perception of time when he claims, "Time is fluid when you live in the immediate state of exile and memory" (25). Househ uses his father's stories in a twofold manner: to break the chronological structure of the text and to reinforce the larger shared experience of exile and solidarity in Jordan and Canada. Mowafa Said Househ provides an intriguing narrative with an engaging structure that is clearly a significant contribution to a growing body of literature and research surrounding the life experiences and worldviews of Palestinians. However, the work leaves readers wondering what larger roles women had in different environments—refugee camps, Canadian communities, mosques, schools, and businesses. Grace Brandt Department of History University of South Dakota Copyright © 2024 Center for Great Plains Studies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreat Plains researchSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207