Correction: Zebrafish <i>raptor</i> mutation inhibits the activity of mTORC1, inducing craniofacial defects due to autophagy-induced neural crest cell death
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There were errors in Development (2024) 151, dev202216 (doi:10.1242/dev.202216).The incorrect spelling of author name Ritika Ghosal was used. The correct author list appears above.The title and first part of the legend for Fig. 7 were incorrect. The corrected and original titles and legends are shown below:Corrected:Fig. 7. Chemical inhibition of apoptosis partially rescues the Meckel's cartilage defect. (A) Length of Meckel's cartilage in untreated wild type, untreated mutants and 25 µM caspase-treated mutants. Each point represents one side of the lower jaw (Meckel's cartilage). The statistical analyses were conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) post-hoc test for multiple comparisons, *P<0.05, ****P<0.0001. (B-D) Ventral views of 4 dpf fish, anterior is towards the left. The top and bottom of each box correspond to the third quartile (Q3) and first quartile (Q1), respectively. Each box covers the interquartile range (IQR), where 50% of the data lies. The median is depicted by the horizontal line within each box. The upper whisker extends to the largest value within Q3 + 1.5 * IQR. The lower whisker extends to the smallest value within Q1 - 1.5 * IQR. Any data point outside these whiskers is classified as an outlier. See Mcgill et al. (1978).Original:Fig. 7. Chemical inhibition of autophagy via caspase inhibitor partially rescues the Meckel's cartilage size defect. (A) Graph of linear measurements of Meckel's cartilage length. Each point is one anterior or posterior cartilage, two cartilages per fish. The statistical analyses were conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) post-hoc test for multiple comparisons, *P<0.05, ****P<0.0001. (B-D) Ventral views of 4 dpf fish, anterior is towards the left. The top and bottom of each box correspond to the third quartile (Q3) and first quartile (Q1), respectively. Each box covers the interquartile range (IQR), where 50% of the data lies. The median is depicted by the horizontal line within each box. The upper whisker extends to the largest value within Q3 + 1.5 * IQR. The lower whisker extends to the smallest value within Q1 - 1.5 * IQR. Any data point outside these whiskers is classified as an outlier. See Mcgill et al. (1978).The legend for Fig. S1 incorrectly stated that z-sections were shown instead of z-projections. The correct legend is shown below:Fig. S1. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization of raptor at 48 hpf. (A-C) Confocal images of double-labeling experiment utilizing wild-type fli1:EGFP fish at 48 hpf, stained with fluorescent in-situ for raptor in red. z-projections are shown, anterior is to the left. Representative images of (A) double-labeled whole body, (B) double-labeled head, and (C) raptor fluorescent in-situ head.The legend for Fig. S4 incorrectly stated that qPCR was shown instead of RT-PCR. The correct legend is shown below:Fig. S4. mTOR pathway genes are maternally provided. RT-PCR of cDNA collected from 2-cell zebrafish embryos.The legend for Fig. S6 was inadvertently repeated for Fig. S7. The correct legend is shown below:Fig. S7. Wild-type and raptor mutants have similar expression patterns of dlx2a, barx1 and nkx3.2. (A-A’’’) Wild-type and (B-B’’’) raptor mutant fish at 30 hpf. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization showing (A,B) merged, (A’,B’)dlx2a(A’’,B’’)barx1 and (A’’’,B’’’)nkx3.2 expression.The authors apologise to the readers for these errors and any inconvenience they may have caused.The online full-text and PDF versions of the paper have been corrected.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».