Notice bibliographique
Résumé
How could she do it? In Inger Frimansson's fine novel Good Night, My Darling, published in New York by Caravel Books, an imprint of Pleasure Boat Studio, the question is not who committed a crime, nor whether the protagonist might meet a horrible death. There are no guns, no drug dealers, no gangsters. Instead, crimes are committed amid the ordinary lives of ordinary people. With this novel, Inger Frimansson won the Swedish Academy of Mystery Authors Award for Best Swedish Crime Novel. Newly translated into English by Laura Wideburg, this book is a gripping account of Justine who, as a child, was first neglected and then persecuted by a self-absorbed stepmother. At school, she was bullied by classmates. As we, the readers, squirm with Justine's victimization, we are ahead of her in feeling vindictive. Not until Justine is in her forties does she catch up with the readers’ feelings. Good Night, My Darling follows several threads, each a life of one of the novel's principal characters. Only after the middle of the book do these threads start to form a skein. Only then can we look each character in the eye. One character is Justine. Another is her stepmother, Flora: not just selfish, but so narcissistic that her cruelty makes us gasp. A third character is Justine's father: not a bad person, but neither perceptive nor strong enough to protect his daughter from Flora. A fourth character is a former classmate of Justine's, a child bully who grows up to be a normal adult. A fifth character is a rather characterless man who meets Justine towards the end of the book and becomes her lover. As the threads twist together, a growing sense of the ominous makes the book hard to put down. All is not well with Justine, but we have no idea what will happen. It is not until we are more than three-quarters of the way through the book that the first explicit crime occurs, and not until after that does anyone in the role of detective appear. Inger Frimansson enables the reader to enter Justine's child-thoughts of being an almost willing victim who absorbs both the hurt and the methods of cruelty used to hurt her. We sympathize with Justine the child, but as she grows to maturity we become less sympathetic. Justine the adult has two lovers: there are scenes of eroticism and even affection, but the damage we know Justine has suffered makes it difficult to believe in their goodness. Will our sympathy carry to the point when the victim achieves sufficient power to assert herself? Crime stories have been adored in popular culture. The inventor of the short form was Edgar Allen Poe, with “The Murders in the Rue Morgue” of 1841. Wilkie Collins is credited with the invention of the full-length version; his novel of 1860, The Woman in White, is a thriller with puzzles. Mary Braddon acknowledged her debt to it, and wrote the first novel-length detective story, Lady Audley's Secret (1862). P.D. James has pointed out that the psychological appeal of detective stories is that a crime has torn the fabric of society, and repair is needed. Classically, the repair is made by a somewhat other-worldly person (already present in Braddon's novel) who applies mere thought to solve the problem. With the perpetrator identified, society can function again. As the literary theorist Tzvetan Todorov has proposed, this kind of story is really two stories. The first is action, the commission of a crime. The second is the investigation. In most whodunits the first story is vestigial. For seventy years, part of the other-worldliness of the detective was immunity from injury by the criminals. Then, in 1930, the first story, in Todorov's sense, grew suddenly to full size in Dashiell Hammett's The Maltese Falcon, in which rather than being other-worldly the detective is worldly. This puts him in serious danger. There's less cerebration, more action. The thriller had arrived. Popular as these genres are, has not something been left out: exploration of why people commit crimes that tear the fabric of society? It takes courage to experiment with a new genre. This is what Inger Frimansson has done. Good Night, My Darling is not a whodunit and not a thriller. It's a how-could-she-do-it.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».