Abstract PS16-03: Intratumoral dosing of INT230-6 in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Induces Tumor Cell Necrosis and Immunomodulatory Effects: A Phase II Randomized Window-Of-Opportunity Study – the INVINCIBLE Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Larger tumors pose an increased risk for breast cancer (BC) recurrence post-surgery. In addition, most BC outside of the triple negative subtype are considered immunological quiescent and minimally responsive to immunotherapies. One potential method to combat disease recurrence risk and induce immune activation pre-surgery is through a local therapy that could cause cell death to expose tumor antigens, provide adjuvants for anti-tumor immune priming, and thus potentially increase responsiveness to immunotherapies or rates of pathological complete response in combination with chemotherapy. We have conducted a randomized, Phase 2 presurgical Window-Of-Opportunity trial for intratumoral (IT) INT230-6 comprising vinblastine, cisplatin and a diffusion enhancer (SHAO) in patients with early-stage operable BC, the INVINCIBLE trial (NCT04781725). Previous in vivo and clinical studies demonstrated that INT230-6 induces cancer cell death and halts replication while maturing dendritic cells and recruiting T-cells into the tumor. In this trial, IT injections of INT230-6 were conducted to 1) evaluate the safety of regional cytotoxic use on BC, 2) assess the drug’s ability to cause necrosis, 3) assess immune response within the tumor, microenvironment and systemically prior to surgical resection, and 4) understand the genetic pathways involved in immune activity. Methods: Women awaiting surgery for newly diagnosed early-stage intermediate or high-grade T1-T2 invasive BC were recruited to the trial. The study has two parts. Part I was a randomized (2:1) open label trial comparing 1-3 doses of INT230-6 injected weekly versus no treatment prior to surgery to evaluate safety, feasibility, and optimal drug dosing. Part II was a double-blinded randomized (2:1) trial where patients received one IT dose of INT230-6 vs saline injection IT. Results: We successfully recruited 91 patients with age ranges of 40-77 yrs (mean of 60 yrs) with tumor size ranging from 1.1 - 4.8 cm (mean 2.5 cm; SD 0.9 cm). The most common (>10%) AEs were injection site pain, injection site reaction and nausea/vomiting. Approximately 90% of AEs were grade 1. In the study INT230-6 induced necrosis in 64% of subjects (37 out of 58, range 0 to 100%); whereas saline induced partial necrosis in 25% of patients (5 out of 20, range 0 to 10%). The table below shows the results of necrosis for INT230-6 use in the entire study compared to saline injection for all subjects and those with tumors of size T2. A single injection of INT230-6 caused necrosis in various histologies, including invasive lobular carcinoma. Gene expression analysis showed significant differential gene expression between the baseline biopsy and surgical specimens using INT230-6. Pathway analysis identified genes associated with TCR signaling, B cells and T cell activation that were significantly upregulated in the post INT230-6 treatment samples. There was a relative increase in CD4 and CD8 T cells and B and mast cells. Conclusion: Preliminary evidence shows that a single dose of INT230-6 can cause significant intratumoral necrosis compared to saline especially in tumors >2. cm. INT230-6 stimulates an immune response in breast cancers prior to surgery with minimal adverse effects and good tolerability. Given its immune activation properties, INT230-6 shows promising potential in future breast cancer neoadjuvant studies. Table 1: INVINCIBLE Study Tumor Necrosis Results Intratumoral INT230-6 injection compared to IT saline injection Citation Format: Angel Arnaout, Lewis Bender, Megan Hopkins, Vanessa Lopez Ozuna, Linda Liao, Susan Robertson, Vida Talebian, Kianoosh Keyhanian, Arif Awan, Franco Abbate, Ian Walters, Gregory Pond, John Bartlett, Lazlo Radvanyi, Melanie Spears. Intratumoral dosing of INT230-6 in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Induces Tumor Cell Necrosis and Immunomodulatory Effects: A Phase II Randomized Window-Of-Opportunity Study – the INVINCIBLE Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS16-03.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».