Abstract PO4-08-09: Concordance analysis of paired breast cancer core needle biopsies and surgical excision samples using the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract INTRODUCTION: The Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® (RS) assay is validated to predict risk of distant recurrence at 10 years and the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+, HER2- early breast cancer who receive 5 years of endocrine therapy. The feasibility of Oncotype DX® testing with diagnostic core needle biopsies (CNB) was demonstrated through analysis of a large commercial laboratory experience. The neoadjuvant ADAPT study showed the clinical utility of deriving the Recurrence Score® (RS) result from CNB as well. However, data are limited on concordance of RS results from paired CNB and surgical samples. Our primary objective was to determine the degree of concordance of RS results between paired tissue samples from the same primary breast tumor of patients with early stage, ER+, HER2- invasive breast cancer who had a CNB and subsequent surgical excision (SE; lumpectomy or mastectomy) without intervening systemic therapy. METHODS: Patients with a commercial RS result on either CNB or subsequent SE were identified through medical record and clinical database review. A pathologist reviewed archival tissue samples to confirm eligibility and selected the other paired CNB or SE block most representative of the tumor tissue for subsequent study Oncotype DX testing. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient and tumor characteristics. Wilcoxon signed rank, McNemar’s and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests were used to compare RS between SE and CNB paired samples. Cohen’s Kappa and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the agreement of categorical RS (0-25 and 26-100) result between SE and CNB paired samples. Lin’s concordance correlation and 95% CIs were used to compare agreement of continuous RS between paired samples. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were identified with paired CNB and SE samples with a median time of 34 (range 5-103) days between collections. Of the 134 patients, a commercial RS result was available for 25 (18.7%) with CNB and 109 (81.3%) with SE. A study RS result was then generated on the other paired sample. Median age was 62 years (range 33-99; 23 patients [17%] were age ≤50 vs. 111 [83%] age >50). Cases were predominantly node negative (107/134 node negative vs. 26/134 node positive; 1/134 unknown) invasive ductal carcinomas (104/134 ductal vs. 18/134 classic lobular vs. 12/134 other). Mean RS results were 15.6 (range 0-56) and 16.6 (range 0-59) for CNB and SE, respectively (p = 0.003), with no statistically significant differences in RS category defined as low vs. high risk (119/134 CNB vs. 114/134 SE for RS 0-25 and 15/134 CNB vs 20/134 SE for RS 26-100; p = 0.13) or low vs. intermediate vs. high risk (85/134 CNB vs. 78/134 SE for RS 0-17 and 43/134 CNB vs. 48/134 SE for RS 18-30 and 6/134 CNB vs. 8/134 SE for RS 31-100; p = 0.19). No differences were observed based on age relative to 50 years or nodal status (data not shown). Cohen’s Kappa statistic k = 0.64 (95% CI, 0.44-0.83) supports substantial agreement between the CNB and SE samples. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) demonstrates similar agreement for the continuous RS result between paired samples (CCC = 0.86 [0.80-0.90]). Overall percent agreement was 91.8% (87.1-96.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Studies evaluating the level of concordance of ER, progesterone receptor, and HER2 biomarker status between CNB and SE samples have found high concordance rates, albeit varied. We now provide data demonstrating high concordance of RS results between CNB and SE specimens obtained from the same breast primary tumor without intervening systemic therapy. This supports use of either biopsy source for testing with a genomic predictor to identify those patients who will most likely benefit from chemotherapy and which patients may be spared. Citation Format: Aziza Nassar, Jodi Carter, Paige Innis, Satish Seerapu, Christy Russell, Helena Hanna, Abigail Lochala, Minetta Liu. Concordance analysis of paired breast cancer core needle biopsies and surgical excision samples using the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-08-09.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».