MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396599570 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po4-25-08

Abstract PO4-25-08: Secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) in an 8-year-old male: Report of an exceptionally rare case with review of clinicoradiologic and pathomolecular findings of SBC in the male pediatric population

2024· article· en· W4396599570 sur OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Brassington, Svetlana Silverman, Ioana Bratu

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMale Breast Health Studies
Établissements canadiensStollery Children's HospitalMisericordia Community HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineGeneral surgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) is a rare and distinct disease, comprising approximately 0.01% of all breast carcinomas. This is a case of an 8-year-old boy who presented with a 1.5-year history of a non-tender, slowly enlarging left subareolar mass, not associated with nipple discharge. Serologic workup revealed minimally elevated prolactin with normal-range FSH, LH, estradiol and testosterone, as well as normal-range beta-hCG, LDH and AFP. Ultrasound showed a circumscribed solid hypoechoic lesion with internal arterial vascularity, favoured to represent a sebaceous cyst. Excisional biopsy was performed, and histologic examination revealed the classic intra- and extracellular secretory material typically seen in SBC. Immunohistochemical (IHC) stains for mammaglobin, S-100 and high molecular weight keratin (CK5) were positive. ER was positive, though not strong staining, and PR and HER2 were negative. A screen for NTRK fusions with pan-TRK IHC was positive. No skin, perineural or lymphovascular invasion was identified. RNA-based NGS demonstrated ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and confirmed the diagnosis of SBC. The patient underwent mastectomy and SLNB, which showed no residual tumor and no positive lymph nodes. A full metastatic work-up was not performed and the patient did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. First described as “juvenile breast carcinoma,” SBC has since been recognized to occur across a wide age range, with most cases occurring in adults. SBC in male pediatric patients is exceptionally rare, with fewer than 20 cases reported in the literature. In this demographic, SBC is usually detected clinically as a subareolar mass not associated with nipple discharge, and appears as a well-circumscribed mass on imaging, mimicking benign entities. SBC is usually detected at a low stage, treated surgically, and follows a clinically indolent course with excellent outcomes. Positive axillary nodes have been identified in a few male children, who subsequently underwent chemo- and/or radiotherapy, with no recorded recurrences in these cases. Distant metastases are an extremely uncommon feature of SBC and have not been reported in the pediatric male population; however, due to the rarity of this diagnosis, particularly in this demographic, robust long-term follow-up data are still lacking. The name “secretory” derives from the histologic appearance of the dense eosinophilic secretory material seen in tumor lumina and bubbly material in the cytoplasm of tumor cells. Similar to the cytologic characteristics of other translocation-driven neoplasms, SBC shows minimal pleomorphism. Mitoses are absent or rare. IHC stains are typically positive for S-100 and high molecular weight keratins and negative for ER, PR, and HER2. Despite the immunophenotypic similarities to triple negative/basal-like carcinomas (TNBC/BLC) the molecular relationship between SBC and TNBC/BLC is unclear. Though initially defined by its distinctive secretions on histology, SBC is now chiefly characterized by a balanced translocation, t(12;15)(p13;q25), resulting in oncogenic ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. Recent cases have demonstrated this using a variety of molecular techniques, including FISH, RT-PCR, and in our case, RNA-based NGS. This translocation also characterizes non-breast secretory carcinomas and has been identified in several other neoplasms, including pediatric mesenchymal tumours and adult acute myeloid leukemia. The rarity of SBC, particularly in the male pediatric population, underlines the necessity of this case report. Additionally, this case highlights the importance of considering SBC as a potential diagnosis in male children presenting with a breast mass, even in the presence of benign imaging characteristics. Table 1: Clinicoradiologic and pathomolecular characteristics of SBC in pediatric males AND, axillary node dissection; CT, chemotherapy; ER, estrogen receptor; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; LE, local excision; MRM, modified radical mastectomy; nd, no data; NED, no evidence of disease; NGS, next-generation sequencing; NS, nodal sampling; PA, periareolar; PR, progesterone receptor; RA, retroareolar; RM, radical mastectomy; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, radiotherapy; SA, subareolar; SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy; SM, simple mastectomy; WLE, wide local excision *Not reported as strong staining Table 2: Immunohistochemical phenotype of secretory breast carcinoma EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor *Not reported as strong staining Table 3: Laboratory investigations AFP, alpha fetoprotein; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LH, luteinizing hormone Citation Format: Rebecca Brassington, Svetlana Silverman, Ioana Bratu. Secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) in an 8-year-old male: Report of an exceptionally rare case with review of clinicoradiologic and pathomolecular findings of SBC in the male pediatric population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-25-08.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,517

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,085
Tête enseignante GPT0,433
Écart entre enseignants0,349 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer ResearchMême sujetMale Breast Health StudiesTravaux en français237 207