MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PO4-25-08: Secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) in an 8-year-old male: Report of an exceptionally rare case with review of clinicoradiologic and pathomolecular findings of SBC in the male pediatric population

2024· article· en· W4396599570 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Brassington, Svetlana Silverman, Ioana Bratu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMale Breast Health Studies
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalMisericordia Community HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) is a rare and distinct disease, comprising approximately 0.01% of all breast carcinomas. This is a case of an 8-year-old boy who presented with a 1.5-year history of a non-tender, slowly enlarging left subareolar mass, not associated with nipple discharge. Serologic workup revealed minimally elevated prolactin with normal-range FSH, LH, estradiol and testosterone, as well as normal-range beta-hCG, LDH and AFP. Ultrasound showed a circumscribed solid hypoechoic lesion with internal arterial vascularity, favoured to represent a sebaceous cyst. Excisional biopsy was performed, and histologic examination revealed the classic intra- and extracellular secretory material typically seen in SBC. Immunohistochemical (IHC) stains for mammaglobin, S-100 and high molecular weight keratin (CK5) were positive. ER was positive, though not strong staining, and PR and HER2 were negative. A screen for NTRK fusions with pan-TRK IHC was positive. No skin, perineural or lymphovascular invasion was identified. RNA-based NGS demonstrated ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and confirmed the diagnosis of SBC. The patient underwent mastectomy and SLNB, which showed no residual tumor and no positive lymph nodes. A full metastatic work-up was not performed and the patient did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. First described as “juvenile breast carcinoma,” SBC has since been recognized to occur across a wide age range, with most cases occurring in adults. SBC in male pediatric patients is exceptionally rare, with fewer than 20 cases reported in the literature. In this demographic, SBC is usually detected clinically as a subareolar mass not associated with nipple discharge, and appears as a well-circumscribed mass on imaging, mimicking benign entities. SBC is usually detected at a low stage, treated surgically, and follows a clinically indolent course with excellent outcomes. Positive axillary nodes have been identified in a few male children, who subsequently underwent chemo- and/or radiotherapy, with no recorded recurrences in these cases. Distant metastases are an extremely uncommon feature of SBC and have not been reported in the pediatric male population; however, due to the rarity of this diagnosis, particularly in this demographic, robust long-term follow-up data are still lacking. The name “secretory” derives from the histologic appearance of the dense eosinophilic secretory material seen in tumor lumina and bubbly material in the cytoplasm of tumor cells. Similar to the cytologic characteristics of other translocation-driven neoplasms, SBC shows minimal pleomorphism. Mitoses are absent or rare. IHC stains are typically positive for S-100 and high molecular weight keratins and negative for ER, PR, and HER2. Despite the immunophenotypic similarities to triple negative/basal-like carcinomas (TNBC/BLC) the molecular relationship between SBC and TNBC/BLC is unclear. Though initially defined by its distinctive secretions on histology, SBC is now chiefly characterized by a balanced translocation, t(12;15)(p13;q25), resulting in oncogenic ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. Recent cases have demonstrated this using a variety of molecular techniques, including FISH, RT-PCR, and in our case, RNA-based NGS. This translocation also characterizes non-breast secretory carcinomas and has been identified in several other neoplasms, including pediatric mesenchymal tumours and adult acute myeloid leukemia. The rarity of SBC, particularly in the male pediatric population, underlines the necessity of this case report. Additionally, this case highlights the importance of considering SBC as a potential diagnosis in male children presenting with a breast mass, even in the presence of benign imaging characteristics. Table 1: Clinicoradiologic and pathomolecular characteristics of SBC in pediatric males AND, axillary node dissection; CT, chemotherapy; ER, estrogen receptor; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; LE, local excision; MRM, modified radical mastectomy; nd, no data; NED, no evidence of disease; NGS, next-generation sequencing; NS, nodal sampling; PA, periareolar; PR, progesterone receptor; RA, retroareolar; RM, radical mastectomy; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, radiotherapy; SA, subareolar; SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy; SM, simple mastectomy; WLE, wide local excision *Not reported as strong staining Table 2: Immunohistochemical phenotype of secretory breast carcinoma EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor *Not reported as strong staining Table 3: Laboratory investigations AFP, alpha fetoprotein; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LH, luteinizing hormone Citation Format: Rebecca Brassington, Svetlana Silverman, Ioana Bratu. Secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) in an 8-year-old male: Report of an exceptionally rare case with review of clinicoradiologic and pathomolecular findings of SBC in the male pediatric population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-25-08.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicMale Breast Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207