MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396614410 · doi:10.1353/wmq.2024.a925923

Eloquence Embodied: Nonverbal Communication among French and Indigenous Peoples in the Americas by Céline Carayon (review)

2024· article· en· W4396614410 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian Ayne Crouch

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe William and Mary Quarterly · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousNonverbal communicationEmbodied cognitionCommunicationLine (geometry)PsychologyLinguisticsHistoryAnthropologySociologyPhilosophyEcologyEpistemologyBiologyMathematicsGeometry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Eloquence Embodied: Nonverbal Communication among French and Indigenous Peoples in the Americas by Céline Carayon Christian Ayne Crouch Eloquence Embodied: Nonverbal Communication among French and Indigenous Peoples in the Americas. By Céline Carayon. Williamsburg, Va., and Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2019. Published by the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture. 472 pages. Cloth, ebook, pdf. In this fresh reading of French Atlantic encounters from the fifteenth through seventeenth centuries, Céline Carayon takes on both the world of nonverbal communications and the possibilities of exchange experienced by Indigenous peoples in the Western Hemisphere, myriad French voyagers, and aspiring settler colonists. The premise of Eloquence Embodied is that communication could be "satisfactory … without (or with minimal) recourse to words" (7) and that, in fact, communication could be improved through physicality, through a world of kinetic gestures, expressions, and carefully orchestrated signs. Recovering the "eloquence embodied" of her title allows Carayon to argue against narratives that have, to her mind, misunderstood and reduced to cultural clash "the multidimensionality of colonial communication events" (8). This book sets out to correct both by attending carefully to extant sources. Portraying the French as "sensitive observers" (12), she takes their records seriously to read for the oral and gestural beyond the verbal. Significantly, and to the credit of her study, she does not suggest that the interactions between Indigenous peoples and settler colonists transpired without conflict. Rather, she demonstrates that attending to the nonverbal allows new insights into evolving French concepts about indigeneity and empire. Going further, she argues that exploring the nature of nonverbal communication will also assist in the recovery of Native epistemologies, alternative literacies, and established cultural practices. These in turn not only provide insights into the successes and failures of French colonial enterprises but also demonstrate how Indigenous peoples manifested and expressed their sovereignty and power. Carayon's work fits nicely into fields that have grown rapidly over the past decades. They encompass monographs that consider the visual and affective world of the early Atlantic, work on performance and disability studies, and the rise of a more textured French Atlantic historiographical tradition.1 Recovering a rich world of signs and gestures appearing in [End Page 440] many ethnographic narratives—but going undiscussed in previous scholarship—Carayon moves beyond a simple history of signs and sign language and into the complements, complications, and tensions between verbal expression and signs and gestures. Her area of study is firmly situated in a French Atlantic world, a decision that lends the book richness and precision because she takes a comparative approach, examining French experiences and sources from across the Western Hemisphere. Scholarship on the French Atlantic tends toward focused studies of particular colonies, such as New France or Kourou (in modern-day French Guiana), studies of regions such as the French Antilles, or focused perspectives on narrow bands of Atlantic exchange between the metropole and a particular colonial destination.2 By integrating encounter narratives from Brazil, Florida, and Canada, Eloquence Embodied offers a refreshing new lens and will hopefully encourage more intracolonial comparative scholarship. If the book engages with scholarship on performance, emotion, disability, and the French Atlantic, it centers on careful readings of Indigenous intentions, actions, and communication as more than simply acts of resistance or reactions to European encounters. Carayon takes pains to provide depth, nuance, and specificity as she explores Indigenous experiences and showcases the ways Indigenous peoples gestured—and thought they gestured—to a shared world of meaning and interpretation central to Indigenous traditions into which Europeans could be incorporated. Divided into three sections, Eloquence Embodied covers, first, the place and practice of nonverbal communication in an Atlantic context. Next, it turns to the transformation of communication strategies and interpretation from the sixteenth to the seventeenth century and, finally, it analyzes the impact of both shared and mistaken nonverbal communications on Indigenous and French experiences in a mutually constituted colonial world. Carayon brings her readers into a world replete with visuality, movement, and sound, illuminating facets of the experiences of Indigenous and French individuals in each chapter and weaving together textual fragments from a range of written and visual sources depicting nonverbal...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,720
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe William and Mary QuarterlyMême sujetLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisTravaux en français237 207