Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Social work is characterised by uncertainty and ambiguity, social workers are mandated to intervene in the lives of families, requiring them to make morally charged, complex decisions with and for families. The field is beset by high workloads, time pressure, negative media attention, and cost-containment measures. In recent years, acknowledgement of the complexities of social work and the challenges faced by professionals has grown, prompting attempts to reorganise the field through frequent reforms, and to reduce uncertainty of practice through standards and accountability measures. Concurrently, there is a greater recognition of the importance of professional judgement, and the need for reflexive practice that engages different knowledges, to allow for more tailored care. The Dutch social care system is currently facing a crisis, and the government has implemented temporary programs to redesign standards and practices. These experimental spaces are the main research site of this thesis, which aims to explore how Dutch social care actors navigate the friction between reforms, standards, accountability, and professional autonomy in highly charged moral settings in social care. This thesis aims to explore how Dutch social care actors navigate the friction between reforms, standards, accountability, and professional autonomy in highly charged moral settings in social care. The research for this thesis was conducted in three studies in the Netherlands: a study on the use of intuition by youth care professionals and two action research studies focused on reform, discretionary space and accountability in social care and child protection. Ultimately, I argue that we need to treat the system similarly to families in need: when professionals look at families, they are expected to look at them as a complex network with a history, with values, different roles and complexities. Families are not expected to get it right immediately, but can work in incremental changes together with those in their network and care providers. However, when there is a crisis or the need for sudden, larger changes, there is space and authority to make these decisions. There is a collective responsibility, reflection and shared decision-making towards the shared aims. This means that the social care system requires engagement in continuous incremental, collective, reparative work that explores alternative notions of success and failure, and in line with that to reconsider underlying values and notions of accountability and governance, to build a system that fosters a space in which vulnerable families, professionals, managers and administrators can be supported.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».