MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396802560 · doi:10.1353/phx.2023.a926369

Scapegoat Carnivale's Tragic Trilogy: Euripides's Medea, Euripides's Bacchae, and Sophocles's Oedipus Tyrannus ed. by Lynn Kozak (review)

2023· article· en· W4396802560 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kathryn Mattison

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTrilogyScapegoatLiteraturePhilosophyArtPsychoanalysisTheologyPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Scapegoat Carnivale's Tragic Trilogy: Euripides's Medea, Euripides's Bacchae, and Sophocles's Oedipus Tyrannus ed. by Lynn Kozak Kathryn Mattison Scapegoat Carnivale's Tragic Trilogy: Euripides's Medea, Euripides's Bacchae, and Sophocles's Oedipus Tyrannus. Edited by Lynn Kozak. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. 2023. Pp. 320. This volume presents new translations of Medea, Bacchae, and Oedipus Tyrannus that were used in performance by Montreal theatre company Scapegoat Carnivale (henceforth SC) between 2010 and 2017. Alongside these excellent new versions we find general introductions to the volume and to Greek tragedy; an introduction to each play that makes reference to staging and the local and international performance context; and a short chapter after each play that introduces important contextual and interpretive elements for those new to tragedy. Overall, the volume has a great deal to offer to students, general audiences, and practitioners who may be considering staging a Greek tragedy. It is engaging and presents the performance possibilities of tragedy in a way that feels fresh and exciting. In the interest of concision, I will address the introductions, the translations, and the contributors' discussions as groups and in that order. In their "Introduction," Erin Hurley and Lynn Kozak explain the overall context of the three plays' production as part of a series called Brave New Looks, in which the ancient material is seen anew through new translations and by new audience members, given the rarity of Greek tragedy in Montreal's anglophone theatre scene. In contrast, they outline the francophone performance tradition of Greek tragedy in Montreal, which Kozak returns to in each of their introductions to the individual plays. The consistent emphasis on the lack of anglophone performances in Canada helps to highlight how little exposure such audiences have to Greek tragedy and is a good reminder that this is one way classics could extend beyond university campuses to engage with the public. Hallie Marshall ("Greek Tragedy in Fifth-Century Athens") takes readers through the Festival of Dionysus, music, genre, politics, performance, and the development of physical theatrical structure. She offers an excellent overview of many aspects of the ancient performance context and also provides references for further reading in the endnotes. The chapter concludes with an evocative speculative description of the sounds, sights, and smells an audience member at the Theatre of Dionysus might have experienced. By ending with an emphasis on the performance context of the festival rather than the texts, Marshall prepares readers to immerse themselves in the world of SC's performances. Immersing the reader is exactly what Kozak achieves in their introduction to each play, by evoking many visual and aural elements while also outlining how the performances were conceptualized and developed. For all three plays, they describe how SC approached the production in terms of staging and setting, providing some contemporary performance context both within Montreal and internationally. Each production drew from a different place and time for aesthetic inspiration: for Medea, SC used the Greek-Turkish population exchange of 1923 as a reference point, with modern Greek pronunciation of names, a bouzouki band, and costumes reflecting the period. The Bacchae was set during The Second Great Awakening in eighteenth- to nineteenth-century America, when religion could inspire "awe and terrible ecstasy" (107), leaning into the deep religious themes of the play. Oedipus Tyrannus was a staged reading rather than a full-scale production due to a lack of funding, but still seems like a visually impressive [End Page 162] production with three different choruses. In these brief introductions, Kozak made me want to experience the plays for myself. They describe intense tableaux of the chorus after Medea's act of murder; two choruses singing in a hymnal mode around a raked stage representing Mount Cithaeron in the Bacchae; and different local choirs positioned around the actors of Oedipus Tyrannus. The plays I know so well were leaping off the page in unexpected and stimulating ways. The plays themselves are Joseph Shragge's adaptations from literal translations (Medea and Bacchae by Andreas Apergis, Oedipus Tyrannus by Lynn Kozak). They are not only enjoyably...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,435
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenixMême sujetJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesTravaux en français237 207