Excessive Hypercholesterolemia in Pregnancy Impairs Later-life Maternal Vascular Function in Rats
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Preeclampsia is a significant risk factor for the development of later-life cardiovascular disease; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. Studies have shown that excessive hypercholesteremia occurring during pregnancy increases the risk of vascular pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia. Bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO), a critical endothelium-derived vasodilator in pregnancy, is reduced in both hypercholesteremia and preeclampsia. However, the later-life vascular impact of excessive pregnancy-specific hypercholesteremia is not known. Hypothesis: Excessive hypercholesteremia in pregnancy impairs later-life maternal vascular function by reducing NO availability. Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a control diet (CD) or high cholesterol diet (HCD; 2% cholesterol + 0.5% cholic acid) from gestational day 6 to 20 (term=22 days; n=10-12). After pregnancy, all dams received a CD. Three months after pregnancy (equal to ~10 years in humans), mesenteric (systemic resistance arteries) and carotid (vascular bed that supplies blood to the cerebral vasculature) arteries were isolated, and endothelium-dependent (to methacholine, MCh) and -independent (to sodium nitroprusside, SNP) vasodilation, plus vasoconstriction responses (to phenylephrine, PE) were assessed using wire myography. NO contribution was assessed using a pan-NO synthase inhibitor (L-NAME; 100 μmol). Data were summarized as maximum responses (E max ), sensitivity (pEC 50 ), or delta E max (control vs. L-NAME). The statistical tests applied were a Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-hoc test (significance: p<0.05). Results: In mesenteric arteries, vasodilation to MCh or SNP was not different between the CD and HCD groups three months after the insult. However, L-NAME reduced maximum vasodilation to MCh in the HCD group (p=0.0433) but not in CD animals. Similarly, vasoconstriction to PE was not different between groups, but L-NAME increased the PE sensitivity in the HCD group (p=0.0423), without effects in the CD animals. In carotid arteries, a HCD during pregnancy reduced vasodilation to MCh (p=0.0345), and while L-NAME prevented vasodilation to MCh in both groups (p<0.0001), this effect was more pronounced in the HCD compared to CD group (delta E max , p=0.0422). Vasodilation to SNP was similar between groups. Vasoconstriction responses to PE were increased in carotid arteries of HCD compared to CD animals (p=0.0357). L-NAME increased PE-mediated vasoconstriction in both groups (CD: 4.32-fold and HCD: 2.71-fold), but this NO modulation was significantly less in the HCD group compared to CD (delta E max , p=0.0337). Conclusion: Exposure to a HCD, during pregnancy only, impaired later-life maternal vascular function in carotid, but not mesenteric arteries, suggesting vascular-bed specific effects in animals with a history of preeclampsia. Moreover, a HCD during pregnancy altered the NO pathway in both vascular beds, indicating that long-term alterations in NO were established during pregnancy. In summary, excessive pregnancy-specific hypercholesterolemia contributes to later-life maternal vascular dysfunction via modulation of the NO pathway, which may help explain the increased cardiovascular risk after preeclampsia. This work was supported by a foundation grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR FS154313) and by the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute (WCHRI) through the generosity of the Stollery Children’s Hospital Foundation and the Alberta Women’s Health Foundation. A.A.O. is supported by a WCHRI postdoctoral fellowship through the generosity of the Stollery Children’s Hospital Foundation and the Alberta Women’s Health Foundation. E.E. was supported by a summer research studentship from Alberta Innovates. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».