Excessive Hypercholesterolemia in Pregnancy Impairs Later-life Maternal Vascular Function in Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Preeclampsia is a significant risk factor for the development of later-life cardiovascular disease; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. Studies have shown that excessive hypercholesteremia occurring during pregnancy increases the risk of vascular pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia. Bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO), a critical endothelium-derived vasodilator in pregnancy, is reduced in both hypercholesteremia and preeclampsia. However, the later-life vascular impact of excessive pregnancy-specific hypercholesteremia is not known. Hypothesis: Excessive hypercholesteremia in pregnancy impairs later-life maternal vascular function by reducing NO availability. Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a control diet (CD) or high cholesterol diet (HCD; 2% cholesterol + 0.5% cholic acid) from gestational day 6 to 20 (term=22 days; n=10-12). After pregnancy, all dams received a CD. Three months after pregnancy (equal to ~10 years in humans), mesenteric (systemic resistance arteries) and carotid (vascular bed that supplies blood to the cerebral vasculature) arteries were isolated, and endothelium-dependent (to methacholine, MCh) and -independent (to sodium nitroprusside, SNP) vasodilation, plus vasoconstriction responses (to phenylephrine, PE) were assessed using wire myography. NO contribution was assessed using a pan-NO synthase inhibitor (L-NAME; 100 μmol). Data were summarized as maximum responses (E max ), sensitivity (pEC 50 ), or delta E max (control vs. L-NAME). The statistical tests applied were a Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-hoc test (significance: p<0.05). Results: In mesenteric arteries, vasodilation to MCh or SNP was not different between the CD and HCD groups three months after the insult. However, L-NAME reduced maximum vasodilation to MCh in the HCD group (p=0.0433) but not in CD animals. Similarly, vasoconstriction to PE was not different between groups, but L-NAME increased the PE sensitivity in the HCD group (p=0.0423), without effects in the CD animals. In carotid arteries, a HCD during pregnancy reduced vasodilation to MCh (p=0.0345), and while L-NAME prevented vasodilation to MCh in both groups (p<0.0001), this effect was more pronounced in the HCD compared to CD group (delta E max , p=0.0422). Vasodilation to SNP was similar between groups. Vasoconstriction responses to PE were increased in carotid arteries of HCD compared to CD animals (p=0.0357). L-NAME increased PE-mediated vasoconstriction in both groups (CD: 4.32-fold and HCD: 2.71-fold), but this NO modulation was significantly less in the HCD group compared to CD (delta E max , p=0.0337). Conclusion: Exposure to a HCD, during pregnancy only, impaired later-life maternal vascular function in carotid, but not mesenteric arteries, suggesting vascular-bed specific effects in animals with a history of preeclampsia. Moreover, a HCD during pregnancy altered the NO pathway in both vascular beds, indicating that long-term alterations in NO were established during pregnancy. In summary, excessive pregnancy-specific hypercholesterolemia contributes to later-life maternal vascular dysfunction via modulation of the NO pathway, which may help explain the increased cardiovascular risk after preeclampsia. This work was supported by a foundation grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR FS154313) and by the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute (WCHRI) through the generosity of the Stollery Children’s Hospital Foundation and the Alberta Women’s Health Foundation. A.A.O. is supported by a WCHRI postdoctoral fellowship through the generosity of the Stollery Children’s Hospital Foundation and the Alberta Women’s Health Foundation. E.E. was supported by a summer research studentship from Alberta Innovates. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".