MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399152984 · doi:10.1353/his.2024.a928547

Demanding Equality: One Hundred Years of Canadian Feminism by Joan Sangster (review)

2024· article· en· W4399152984 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sarah Glassford

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistoire sociale · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFeminismGender studiesSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Demanding Equality: One Hundred Years of Canadian Feminism by Joan Sangster Sarah Glassford Sangster, Joan – Demanding Equality: One Hundred Years of Canadian Feminism. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2021. 470 p. In Demanding Equality, Joan Sangster demonstrates the confidence and virtuosity of a well-seasoned scholar at the top of her game. Her topic is sprawling and unwieldy: the origins, activities, ideologies, successes, failures, controversies, long-term impact, and leading figures of an ever-evolving, amorphous, and often internally divided feminist movement, across Canada, over the course of a century, with attention to social, cultural, economic, political, racial, and intellectual factors. Just the sort of topic, in fact, that undergraduates propose for end-of-term essays before their instructors insist they scale back to something manageable. Sangster gamely plunged in where others rightly fear to tread, and the result is a gift to all of us. The book is organized into 10 chapters that are organized thematically around different versions of feminism (socialist, labour, reform, agrarian) or feminism's engagement with particular issues (suffrage, work, political parties, war and peace). Along the way, it carries readers from the mid-1800s to the end of the 1980s in roughly chronological order. Sangster's commitment to understanding intersectionalism is clear, with BIPOC, francophone, and other minority-inflected experiences (or the lack of attention paid to them by White, anglophone feminists at various points) addressed throughout the book. Labour and socialist feminisms get far more attention from Sangster than they have received in most previous studies, and when this book is read in concert with the recent women's suffrage centennial series from UBC Press, the result is Canadian feminist history that looks rather different—and certainly more diverse and radical—than readers might previously have been led to believe. The book's central chapters are buttressed by an introduction and afterword that add substantial value to the whole. In the introduction, Sangster sets out her definition of feminism (after exploring other options), takes issue with the traditional "waves" interpretation of feminist history, and candidly addresses her role as one of the "feminist activists and creators of history" (p. 11) implicated in the story she is about to tell. The afterword peers ahead into the 1990s and beyond, offering [End Page 222] a brief description of self-described "Third Wave" feminism and reflecting on its strengths, weaknesses, and relationship to what went before or might come after. Time will tell whether Sangster's assessments of these more recent developments (still practically current events) hold up, but either way they will stand as just the sort of primary source she has used elsewhere in the book, in which one feminist generation observes and comments (often critically) on another's differing priorities and approaches. A casual reader could be forgiven for assuming Demanding Equality is a celebratory romp through a succession of "firsts" and a cheerful narrative of progress, since the lives of girls and women looked very different by the 1990s than they did in the 1890s, generally for the better. But this is neither a celebratory nor even a particularly cheerful narrative, and it often makes for downright depressing reading. Because at every step, Sangster argues, the revolution has gone unfinished, as it has been rolled back or undercut by those with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Or maybe, she often suggests, whatever change feminists of a certain period were seeking was not quite radical enough. Earning the vote did not "clean up" politics; electing women to positions of political power did not dramatically alter the patriarchal systems already in place; opening the doors of male-dominated workplaces and professions, winning the right to work after marriage, and passing pay equity legislation did not necessarily close gender pay gaps or mean equal status and treatment on the job. Even today, essential components of true gender equality such as affordable childcare and reproductive justice remain unevenly accessible, if not outright inaccessible, for many women across the country. Sangster also takes great pains to highlight the innumerable ways in which class, race, ethnicity, and religion have limited, and continue to limit, many Canadian women's enjoyment of even the imperfect...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,280
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,562

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0060,016
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,004
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistoire socialeMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207