MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399152984 · doi:10.1353/his.2024.a928547

Demanding Equality: One Hundred Years of Canadian Feminism by Joan Sangster (review)

2024· article· en· W4399152984 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sarah Glassford

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismGender studiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Demanding Equality: One Hundred Years of Canadian Feminism by Joan Sangster Sarah Glassford Sangster, Joan – Demanding Equality: One Hundred Years of Canadian Feminism. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2021. 470 p. In Demanding Equality, Joan Sangster demonstrates the confidence and virtuosity of a well-seasoned scholar at the top of her game. Her topic is sprawling and unwieldy: the origins, activities, ideologies, successes, failures, controversies, long-term impact, and leading figures of an ever-evolving, amorphous, and often internally divided feminist movement, across Canada, over the course of a century, with attention to social, cultural, economic, political, racial, and intellectual factors. Just the sort of topic, in fact, that undergraduates propose for end-of-term essays before their instructors insist they scale back to something manageable. Sangster gamely plunged in where others rightly fear to tread, and the result is a gift to all of us. The book is organized into 10 chapters that are organized thematically around different versions of feminism (socialist, labour, reform, agrarian) or feminism's engagement with particular issues (suffrage, work, political parties, war and peace). Along the way, it carries readers from the mid-1800s to the end of the 1980s in roughly chronological order. Sangster's commitment to understanding intersectionalism is clear, with BIPOC, francophone, and other minority-inflected experiences (or the lack of attention paid to them by White, anglophone feminists at various points) addressed throughout the book. Labour and socialist feminisms get far more attention from Sangster than they have received in most previous studies, and when this book is read in concert with the recent women's suffrage centennial series from UBC Press, the result is Canadian feminist history that looks rather different—and certainly more diverse and radical—than readers might previously have been led to believe. The book's central chapters are buttressed by an introduction and afterword that add substantial value to the whole. In the introduction, Sangster sets out her definition of feminism (after exploring other options), takes issue with the traditional "waves" interpretation of feminist history, and candidly addresses her role as one of the "feminist activists and creators of history" (p. 11) implicated in the story she is about to tell. The afterword peers ahead into the 1990s and beyond, offering [End Page 222] a brief description of self-described "Third Wave" feminism and reflecting on its strengths, weaknesses, and relationship to what went before or might come after. Time will tell whether Sangster's assessments of these more recent developments (still practically current events) hold up, but either way they will stand as just the sort of primary source she has used elsewhere in the book, in which one feminist generation observes and comments (often critically) on another's differing priorities and approaches. A casual reader could be forgiven for assuming Demanding Equality is a celebratory romp through a succession of "firsts" and a cheerful narrative of progress, since the lives of girls and women looked very different by the 1990s than they did in the 1890s, generally for the better. But this is neither a celebratory nor even a particularly cheerful narrative, and it often makes for downright depressing reading. Because at every step, Sangster argues, the revolution has gone unfinished, as it has been rolled back or undercut by those with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Or maybe, she often suggests, whatever change feminists of a certain period were seeking was not quite radical enough. Earning the vote did not "clean up" politics; electing women to positions of political power did not dramatically alter the patriarchal systems already in place; opening the doors of male-dominated workplaces and professions, winning the right to work after marriage, and passing pay equity legislation did not necessarily close gender pay gaps or mean equal status and treatment on the job. Even today, essential components of true gender equality such as affordable childcare and reproductive justice remain unevenly accessible, if not outright inaccessible, for many women across the country. Sangster also takes great pains to highlight the innumerable ways in which class, race, ethnicity, and religion have limited, and continue to limit, many Canadian women's enjoyment of even the imperfect...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.016
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207