Herd-level prevalence of bovine leukemia virus, Salmonella Dublin, and Neospora caninum in Alberta, Canada, dairy herds using ELISA on bulk tank milk samples
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Endemic infectious diseases remain a major challenge for dairy producers worldwide. For effective disease control programs, up-to-date prevalence estimates are of utmost importance. The objective of this study was to estimate the herd-level prevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV), Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica serovar Dublin (Salmonella Dublin), and Neospora caninum in dairy herds in Alberta, Canada, using a serial cross-sectional study design. Bulk tank milk samples from all Alberta dairy farms were collected 4 times, in December 2021 (n = 489), April 2022 (n = 487), July 2022 (n = 487), and October 2022 (n = 480), and tested for antibodies against BLV, Salmonella Dublin, and N. caninum using ELISA. Herd-level apparent prevalence was calculated as positive herds divided by total tested herds at each time point. A mixed-effect modified Poisson regression model was employed to assess the association of prevalence with region, herd size, herd type, and type of milking system. Apparent prevalence of BLV was 89.4%, 88.7%, 86.9%, and 86.9% in December, April, July, and October, respectively, whereas for Salmonella Dublin apparent prevalence was 11.2%, 6.6%, 8.6%, and 8.5%, and for N. caninum apparent prevalence was 18.2%, 7.4%, 7.8%, and 15.0%. For BLV, Salmonella Dublin, and N. caninum, a total of 91.7%, 15.6%, and 28.1% of herds, respectively, were positive at least once, whereas 82.5%, 3.6%, and 3.0% of herds were ELISA positive at all 4 times. Compared with the north region, central Alberta had a high prevalence (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.13) of BLV antibody-positive herds, whereas south Alberta had a high prevalence (PR = 2.56) of herds positive for Salmonella Dublin antibodies. Furthermore, central (PR = 0.52) and south regions (PR = 0.46) had low prevalence of N. caninum-positive herds compared with the north. Hutterite colony herds were more frequently BLV positive (PR = 1.13) but less frequently N. caninum-positive (PR = 0.47). Large herds (>7,200 L/d milk delivered ∼>250 cows) were 1.1 times more often BLV positive, whereas small herds (≤3,600 L/d milk delivered ∼≤125 cows) were 3.2 times more often N. caninum positive. For Salmonella Dublin, Hutterite colony herds were less frequently (PR = 0.07) positive than non-colony herds only in medium and large strata but not in small stratum. Moreover, larger herds were more frequently (PR = 2.20) Salmonella Dublin-positive than smaller herds only in non-colony stratum but not in colony stratum. Moreover, N. caninum prevalence was 1.6 times higher on farms with conventional milking systems compared with farms with an automated milking system. These results provide up-to-date information of the prevalence of these infections that will inform investigations of within-herd prevalence of these infections and help in devising evidence-based disease control strategies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».