Herd-level prevalence of bovine leukemia virus, Salmonella Dublin, and Neospora caninum in Alberta, Canada, dairy herds using ELISA on bulk tank milk samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endemic infectious diseases remain a major challenge for dairy producers worldwide. For effective disease control programs, up-to-date prevalence estimates are of utmost importance. The objective of this study was to estimate the herd-level prevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV), Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica serovar Dublin (Salmonella Dublin), and Neospora caninum in dairy herds in Alberta, Canada, using a serial cross-sectional study design. Bulk tank milk samples from all Alberta dairy farms were collected 4 times, in December 2021 (n = 489), April 2022 (n = 487), July 2022 (n = 487), and October 2022 (n = 480), and tested for antibodies against BLV, Salmonella Dublin, and N. caninum using ELISA. Herd-level apparent prevalence was calculated as positive herds divided by total tested herds at each time point. A mixed-effect modified Poisson regression model was employed to assess the association of prevalence with region, herd size, herd type, and type of milking system. Apparent prevalence of BLV was 89.4%, 88.7%, 86.9%, and 86.9% in December, April, July, and October, respectively, whereas for Salmonella Dublin apparent prevalence was 11.2%, 6.6%, 8.6%, and 8.5%, and for N. caninum apparent prevalence was 18.2%, 7.4%, 7.8%, and 15.0%. For BLV, Salmonella Dublin, and N. caninum, a total of 91.7%, 15.6%, and 28.1% of herds, respectively, were positive at least once, whereas 82.5%, 3.6%, and 3.0% of herds were ELISA positive at all 4 times. Compared with the north region, central Alberta had a high prevalence (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.13) of BLV antibody-positive herds, whereas south Alberta had a high prevalence (PR = 2.56) of herds positive for Salmonella Dublin antibodies. Furthermore, central (PR = 0.52) and south regions (PR = 0.46) had low prevalence of N. caninum-positive herds compared with the north. Hutterite colony herds were more frequently BLV positive (PR = 1.13) but less frequently N. caninum-positive (PR = 0.47). Large herds (>7,200 L/d milk delivered ∼>250 cows) were 1.1 times more often BLV positive, whereas small herds (≤3,600 L/d milk delivered ∼≤125 cows) were 3.2 times more often N. caninum positive. For Salmonella Dublin, Hutterite colony herds were less frequently (PR = 0.07) positive than non-colony herds only in medium and large strata but not in small stratum. Moreover, larger herds were more frequently (PR = 2.20) Salmonella Dublin-positive than smaller herds only in non-colony stratum but not in colony stratum. Moreover, N. caninum prevalence was 1.6 times higher on farms with conventional milking systems compared with farms with an automated milking system. These results provide up-to-date information of the prevalence of these infections that will inform investigations of within-herd prevalence of these infections and help in devising evidence-based disease control strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".