LEGAL EXPERIENCE OF THE USA AND COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL PROVISION OF FORCED DEPORTATION FOREIGNERS AND STATELESS PERSONS FROM UKRAINE
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Relevance of the research topic.Each country, depending on the legal system introduced in it and the historical features of development, has its own authentic, clearly developed mechanism for acquiring citizenship, procedures for issuing identity documents, registration of citizens, control over compliance with the rules of entry (exit) to (from) its territory, rules of stay of foreigners, refugees and stateless persons.However, in the course of violations of these rules of the legislation of one or another state by a foreigner or a stateless person, the question of punishment arises, in the form of forced deportation or deportation of these persons from the territory of the country where the offense was committed.Over the past decade, a significant impact on the study of various aspects of the migration process in Ukraine was carried out with the help of the borrowed experience of the countries of the USA and the European Union.Deportation has been known since ancient times.Thus, in Roman law, deportation was applied to persons for lifelong exile to a foreign land, mostly to an island.Initially, deportation was applied to political criminals, and later to other categories of citizens.This measure was accompanied by confiscation of the property of such a person, deprivation of citizenship and civil rights.In Kyivan Rus', expulsion outside the community ("to send out from the parish") or the region ("to drive out of the land") was used.According to Russian Truth, exile was part of the punishment for serious crimes.In the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, a type of deportation was used -liberation, which by its nature was limited to the current judicial deportation outside the country.Since the time of the Hetmanship, many of its political figures were deported to the Moscow Empire.In Western Europe, mass deportation began to be practiced in Portugal, from where at the end of the 15th century.criminals were deported to South America.In the criminal law of France, deportation meant special types of exile to overseas colonies, which were used in the 18th -19th centuries.both to recidivist criminals and to political criminals (for example, the Paris Communards).A mass campaign of deportation and genocide of French and Franco-Acadian settlers was carried out by the British with the official support of the authorities in the territory of modern Canada.Deportation and genocide affected the French-speaking inhabitants of the former French territories (Acadia Nova Scotia) in Atlantic Canada, which came under the jurisdiction of Great Britain.In total, from 1755 to 1763, on the orders of the British governor Charles Lawrence, more than 10,000 people were deported, more than half of whom died in the holds of the ships that transported them to the prisons of those British colonies in North America, which later created the United States, and to the Falkland Islands islands Initially, the campaign was called "The Great Disturbance".The purpose of the scientific article.Analyzing the foreign experience of regulating the processes of migration, deportation, and deportation, it should be noted that this experience is contradictory, the continuity of state policy in the field of population migration is the same as in Ukraine.The experience of the USA and European countries in the field of migration policy is ambiguous.There are many unresolved problems in the countries of the European Union.However, European countries have experience in legal regulation of migration, protection of the rights and legitimate interests of persons carrying out professional activities outside their states, and ensuring national security.Their study and generalization will contribute to the improvement of migration relations in Ukraine, without repeating their mistakes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle