MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399347474 · doi:10.32782/2524-0374/2024-4/83

LEGAL EXPERIENCE OF THE USA AND COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL PROVISION OF FORCED DEPORTATION FOREIGNERS AND STATELESS PERSONS FROM UKRAINE

2024· article· en· W4399347474 sur OpenAlex
I. L. Hula

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJuridical scientific and electronic journal · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLegal Studies and Reforms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDeportationStateless protocolEuropean unionPolitical scienceLawImmigrationBusinessInternational tradeComputer security

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Relevance of the research topic.Each country, depending on the legal system introduced in it and the historical features of development, has its own authentic, clearly developed mechanism for acquiring citizenship, procedures for issuing identity documents, registration of citizens, control over compliance with the rules of entry (exit) to (from) its territory, rules of stay of foreigners, refugees and stateless persons.However, in the course of violations of these rules of the legislation of one or another state by a foreigner or a stateless person, the question of punishment arises, in the form of forced deportation or deportation of these persons from the territory of the country where the offense was committed.Over the past decade, a significant impact on the study of various aspects of the migration process in Ukraine was carried out with the help of the borrowed experience of the countries of the USA and the European Union.Deportation has been known since ancient times.Thus, in Roman law, deportation was applied to persons for lifelong exile to a foreign land, mostly to an island.Initially, deportation was applied to political criminals, and later to other categories of citizens.This measure was accompanied by confiscation of the property of such a person, deprivation of citizenship and civil rights.In Kyivan Rus', expulsion outside the community ("to send out from the parish") or the region ("to drive out of the land") was used.According to Russian Truth, exile was part of the punishment for serious crimes.In the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, a type of deportation was used -liberation, which by its nature was limited to the current judicial deportation outside the country.Since the time of the Hetmanship, many of its political figures were deported to the Moscow Empire.In Western Europe, mass deportation began to be practiced in Portugal, from where at the end of the 15th century.criminals were deported to South America.In the criminal law of France, deportation meant special types of exile to overseas colonies, which were used in the 18th -19th centuries.both to recidivist criminals and to political criminals (for example, the Paris Communards).A mass campaign of deportation and genocide of French and Franco-Acadian settlers was carried out by the British with the official support of the authorities in the territory of modern Canada.Deportation and genocide affected the French-speaking inhabitants of the former French territories (Acadia Nova Scotia) in Atlantic Canada, which came under the jurisdiction of Great Britain.In total, from 1755 to 1763, on the orders of the British governor Charles Lawrence, more than 10,000 people were deported, more than half of whom died in the holds of the ships that transported them to the prisons of those British colonies in North America, which later created the United States, and to the Falkland Islands islands Initially, the campaign was called "The Great Disturbance".The purpose of the scientific article.Analyzing the foreign experience of regulating the processes of migration, deportation, and deportation, it should be noted that this experience is contradictory, the continuity of state policy in the field of population migration is the same as in Ukraine.The experience of the USA and European countries in the field of migration policy is ambiguous.There are many unresolved problems in the countries of the European Union.However, European countries have experience in legal regulation of migration, protection of the rights and legitimate interests of persons carrying out professional activities outside their states, and ensuring national security.Their study and generalization will contribute to the improvement of migration relations in Ukraine, without repeating their mistakes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,585
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle