MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399571868 · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1423847

Editorial: Mindfulness-based interventions in clinical settings: are there benefits for both patients and their physicians?

2024· editorial· en· W4399571868 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Petra Hanson, Rohit Shankar, Jeremy Dale, Juan V. Luciano

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Psychology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueMind wandering and attention
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMindfulnessPsychological interventionPsychologyPsychotherapistClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Humans are programmed to think about issues outside their immediate vicinity, for example past events and speculation of the future. In fact, mind wandering appears to be the human brain's default mode of operation (Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010). The opposite of mind wandering is meditation and mindfulness.For thousands of years, philosophical and religious traditions have studied the implications of meditation for individuals and society (Sun, 2014) concluding that happiness is found by living "in the moment". Practitioners are trained to resist mind wandering and to be grounded in the "here and now". Mindfulness is considered to be a decontextualized and 'modern' form of meditation. As defined by Jon Kabat-Zinn (1994) it is 'paying attention in a particular way, on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally.' Different forms of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and compassion-based interventions (CBIs) have been developed in recent decades with efforts to integrate Buddhist meditation to Western science. These structured protocols of MBIs and CBIs have been tested for a wide range of physical (e.g., diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, etc.) and psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, etc.). They have also been utilised for reducing and management of burnout and stress of healthcare professionals (Fendel, Bürkle, & Göritz, 2021;Goldberg et al., 2022;Kirby et al., 2017).The Research Topic focused on the benefits of mindfulness and compassion for patients, as well as for practitioners. The six studies are diverse. They include studies on state mindfulness psychometric measures, systematic review of cultivating self-compassion for the management of low back pain, cross sectional inquiry assessing the relationship between mindfulness state and work-life balance, a randomised control trial protocol examining the feasibility and efficacy of MBIs for both patients and professionals and a couple of pilot studies. We provide a brief outline of the included studies and offer suggestions for advancing this field.Burnout in health care workers is omnipresent across the world. In healthcare there are several aspects outside the individual's locus of control (admin burden, lack of staff, increase in numbers of patients). However, attempts can be made to learn to control one's internal environment and reflect on how to respond to these external factors. Innovative initiatives using mindfulness approaches strive to address this. Server et al. (2022) study assessed the feasibility of an eight-week mindfulness program designed to reduce staff burnout working in a pain clinic in a tertiary public hospital in Barcelona, Spain. In this longitudinal cohort study daily 10-minute mindfulness practise for eight weeks was combined with virtual group sessions for 10 participants. The main outcome was feasibility of delivery of these group sessions. A high adherence (95%) and participation rate (90%) was noted. Exploratory analyses on the 10 participants showed promising results with improvement in mindfulness and burnout in physicians. This is the first study of its kind i.e. assessing mindfulness interventions in health care workers who look after people living with pain. Roman et al. (2023) focused on improving emotional burden and work-related stressors among medical interpreters. In this mixed-methods pilot study, weekly in-person one-hour sessions adapted from Mindful Practice in Medicine were delivered for eight weeks to 17 participants in University or Rochester Medical Centre. Results showed improved resilience, teamwork, coping, compassion satisfaction and burnout after the course and one month later. This was the first study of its kind to be done in medical interpreters. Lin et al. (2024) delved into the effects of mindfulness on work-life balance, spirituality and perceived professional benefits among nurses. This cross-sectional study of 303 nurses in hospitals in Jiangxi Province, China using complex regression analysis and modelling showed a positive relationship between mindfulness traits, workplace spirituality and enhanced sense of work fulfilment. There will be 30 participants per study arm. This study, designed as a five -month randomized controlled trial, will analyse the effectiveness of these interventions added to the standard treatment for children with ADHD. Additionally, it will explore the role of psychological variables such as emotional regulation as mediators of short-and medium-term clinical outcomes.Meanwhile, Navarrete et al (2023) examined the psychometric properties of two mindfulness scales in the Spanish population. The Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS) and the State Mindfulness Scale (SMS) were analyzed in six distinct samples from the Spanish general population. The results show a robust factor structure and adequate convergent and discriminant validity, supporting their utility in assessing state mindfulness in the Spanish population. However, it is important to highlight the poor reliability of the SMS specific factors, which suggest that the computation of sub-scale scores would not be warranted. Greff-Ballejos, Calvetti, Schaab, & Reppold (2023) argue that self-compassion could emerge as a promising tool to improve both pain control and mental health. Their systematic review investigates the benefits of self-compassion-related interventions in adults with low back pain. Compiled results of the four studies meeting inclusion criteria suggest that self-compassion can reduce pain intensity, psychological stress, and improve pain acceptance. However, the need for more research in this field is emphasized.This research topic highlights the vast potential of mindfulness-based interventions in a clinical setting and the need for further research. The interventions described have the potential to improve wellbeing and health of both clinical staff and patients. However, the small numbers of participants in the interventional studies, lack of randomisation and not enough longitudinal data contribute to hesitancy of recommending these interventions at a large scale. Health care services and funding bodies should recognise mindfulness as a potential intervention and support further research.Mindfulness has significant potential given that it can be used via self-management via user empowerment, is safe and likely to be cost effective compared to current available interventions. The only caveat is that it only works if it is practised, but as Sharon Salzberg said "Mindfulness isn't difficult, we just need to remember to do it."

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,026
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,084

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,033
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,004
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,004
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0060,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0260,022
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0250,019

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,323 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in PsychologyMême sujetMind wandering and attentionTravaux en français237 207