MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399571868 · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1423847

Editorial: Mindfulness-based interventions in clinical settings: are there benefits for both patients and their physicians?

2024· editorial· en· W4399571868 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Petra Hanson, Rohit Shankar, Jeremy Dale, Juan V. Luciano

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMind wandering and attention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessPsychological interventionPsychologyPsychotherapistClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Humans are programmed to think about issues outside their immediate vicinity, for example past events and speculation of the future. In fact, mind wandering appears to be the human brain's default mode of operation (Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010). The opposite of mind wandering is meditation and mindfulness.For thousands of years, philosophical and religious traditions have studied the implications of meditation for individuals and society (Sun, 2014) concluding that happiness is found by living "in the moment". Practitioners are trained to resist mind wandering and to be grounded in the "here and now". Mindfulness is considered to be a decontextualized and 'modern' form of meditation. As defined by Jon Kabat-Zinn (1994) it is 'paying attention in a particular way, on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally.' Different forms of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and compassion-based interventions (CBIs) have been developed in recent decades with efforts to integrate Buddhist meditation to Western science. These structured protocols of MBIs and CBIs have been tested for a wide range of physical (e.g., diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, etc.) and psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, etc.). They have also been utilised for reducing and management of burnout and stress of healthcare professionals (Fendel, Bürkle, & Göritz, 2021;Goldberg et al., 2022;Kirby et al., 2017).The Research Topic focused on the benefits of mindfulness and compassion for patients, as well as for practitioners. The six studies are diverse. They include studies on state mindfulness psychometric measures, systematic review of cultivating self-compassion for the management of low back pain, cross sectional inquiry assessing the relationship between mindfulness state and work-life balance, a randomised control trial protocol examining the feasibility and efficacy of MBIs for both patients and professionals and a couple of pilot studies. We provide a brief outline of the included studies and offer suggestions for advancing this field.Burnout in health care workers is omnipresent across the world. In healthcare there are several aspects outside the individual's locus of control (admin burden, lack of staff, increase in numbers of patients). However, attempts can be made to learn to control one's internal environment and reflect on how to respond to these external factors. Innovative initiatives using mindfulness approaches strive to address this. Server et al. (2022) study assessed the feasibility of an eight-week mindfulness program designed to reduce staff burnout working in a pain clinic in a tertiary public hospital in Barcelona, Spain. In this longitudinal cohort study daily 10-minute mindfulness practise for eight weeks was combined with virtual group sessions for 10 participants. The main outcome was feasibility of delivery of these group sessions. A high adherence (95%) and participation rate (90%) was noted. Exploratory analyses on the 10 participants showed promising results with improvement in mindfulness and burnout in physicians. This is the first study of its kind i.e. assessing mindfulness interventions in health care workers who look after people living with pain. Roman et al. (2023) focused on improving emotional burden and work-related stressors among medical interpreters. In this mixed-methods pilot study, weekly in-person one-hour sessions adapted from Mindful Practice in Medicine were delivered for eight weeks to 17 participants in University or Rochester Medical Centre. Results showed improved resilience, teamwork, coping, compassion satisfaction and burnout after the course and one month later. This was the first study of its kind to be done in medical interpreters. Lin et al. (2024) delved into the effects of mindfulness on work-life balance, spirituality and perceived professional benefits among nurses. This cross-sectional study of 303 nurses in hospitals in Jiangxi Province, China using complex regression analysis and modelling showed a positive relationship between mindfulness traits, workplace spirituality and enhanced sense of work fulfilment. There will be 30 participants per study arm. This study, designed as a five -month randomized controlled trial, will analyse the effectiveness of these interventions added to the standard treatment for children with ADHD. Additionally, it will explore the role of psychological variables such as emotional regulation as mediators of short-and medium-term clinical outcomes.Meanwhile, Navarrete et al (2023) examined the psychometric properties of two mindfulness scales in the Spanish population. The Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS) and the State Mindfulness Scale (SMS) were analyzed in six distinct samples from the Spanish general population. The results show a robust factor structure and adequate convergent and discriminant validity, supporting their utility in assessing state mindfulness in the Spanish population. However, it is important to highlight the poor reliability of the SMS specific factors, which suggest that the computation of sub-scale scores would not be warranted. Greff-Ballejos, Calvetti, Schaab, & Reppold (2023) argue that self-compassion could emerge as a promising tool to improve both pain control and mental health. Their systematic review investigates the benefits of self-compassion-related interventions in adults with low back pain. Compiled results of the four studies meeting inclusion criteria suggest that self-compassion can reduce pain intensity, psychological stress, and improve pain acceptance. However, the need for more research in this field is emphasized.This research topic highlights the vast potential of mindfulness-based interventions in a clinical setting and the need for further research. The interventions described have the potential to improve wellbeing and health of both clinical staff and patients. However, the small numbers of participants in the interventional studies, lack of randomisation and not enough longitudinal data contribute to hesitancy of recommending these interventions at a large scale. Health care services and funding bodies should recognise mindfulness as a potential intervention and support further research.Mindfulness has significant potential given that it can be used via self-management via user empowerment, is safe and likely to be cost effective compared to current available interventions. The only caveat is that it only works if it is practised, but as Sharon Salzberg said "Mindfulness isn't difficult, we just need to remember to do it."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0260.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychologySame topicMind wandering and attentionFrench-language works237,207