(030) PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES OF CORE EXCISION FOR SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF NEUROPROLIFERATIVE VESTIBULODYNIA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Among patients with neuroproliferative vestibulodynia (NPV) experiencing pain on cotton-tip swab testing at the 1:00-11:00 vestibule prior to complete vestibulectomy surgery, a subset also had pain at the 12:00 vestibule. Excision of the 12:00 core region may be performed concomitantly or after healing from the vestibulectomy. Given that a vaginal flap cannot be advanced to this area, only a core excision is removed and closed using surrounding 12:00 tissue. Differences between the post-operative improvement in the 1:00-11:00 and the 12:00 regions have not been examined to date. To better understand the success of core excision of the 12:00 region, we assessed post-operative patient-reported outcomes specifically of this vestibular region. Objective To characterize patients who underwent 12:00 excision as well as assess Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) specifically regarding 12:00 core excision in individuals with NPV. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients from one clinic who had undergone a 12:00 core excision. Preoperative baseline assessments included Vulvar Pain Functional Questionnaire (V-Q), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), cotton-tip swab test results. Dimensions of the excised tissue as determined by pathology report, responses to the PGI-I scale at > 6 months post-op, and any adverse events were collected. Descriptive statistics were conducted to analyze the PGI-I scores and other outcomes. Results The majority of patients (67%, n=21), with an average age of 26, rated their 12:00 pain as “much improved” or “very much improved” on the PGI-I scale. Mean duration of follow up since surgery was one year and five months, with a minimum follow up of 9 months. Most patients (90%) did not have regrets about having the 12:00 region removed. Most patients (83%) would recommend this surgery to other patients who have 12:00 pain. There were no significant post-operative adverse events with 12:00 excision. Mean dimensions of the excised specimen were 1.01 cm x 0.60 cm x 0.21 cm, 3% of the size of the 1:00-11:00 vestibule excised. Preoperatively, patient reported mean FSFI pain domain was 0.67, SF-MPQ 16.80, affective 5.15 and PPI 3.42. Mean V-Q prior to surgery was 11.68, mean cotton-tip swab test result for the 12:00 region was 6.15. Conclusions Performing core excision of a very small volume of tissue during surgery in patients with 12:00 pain is associated with an improved PGI-I score in 67% of patients. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is warranted to confirm these findings and optimize the management of vestibulodynia. In patients who fail 12:00 core excision surgery, buccal mucosal grafting of the entire 12:00 vestibule may be a future option. Disclosure No.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».