(030) PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES OF CORE EXCISION FOR SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF NEUROPROLIFERATIVE VESTIBULODYNIA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Among patients with neuroproliferative vestibulodynia (NPV) experiencing pain on cotton-tip swab testing at the 1:00-11:00 vestibule prior to complete vestibulectomy surgery, a subset also had pain at the 12:00 vestibule. Excision of the 12:00 core region may be performed concomitantly or after healing from the vestibulectomy. Given that a vaginal flap cannot be advanced to this area, only a core excision is removed and closed using surrounding 12:00 tissue. Differences between the post-operative improvement in the 1:00-11:00 and the 12:00 regions have not been examined to date. To better understand the success of core excision of the 12:00 region, we assessed post-operative patient-reported outcomes specifically of this vestibular region. Objective To characterize patients who underwent 12:00 excision as well as assess Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) specifically regarding 12:00 core excision in individuals with NPV. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients from one clinic who had undergone a 12:00 core excision. Preoperative baseline assessments included Vulvar Pain Functional Questionnaire (V-Q), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), cotton-tip swab test results. Dimensions of the excised tissue as determined by pathology report, responses to the PGI-I scale at > 6 months post-op, and any adverse events were collected. Descriptive statistics were conducted to analyze the PGI-I scores and other outcomes. Results The majority of patients (67%, n=21), with an average age of 26, rated their 12:00 pain as “much improved” or “very much improved” on the PGI-I scale. Mean duration of follow up since surgery was one year and five months, with a minimum follow up of 9 months. Most patients (90%) did not have regrets about having the 12:00 region removed. Most patients (83%) would recommend this surgery to other patients who have 12:00 pain. There were no significant post-operative adverse events with 12:00 excision. Mean dimensions of the excised specimen were 1.01 cm x 0.60 cm x 0.21 cm, 3% of the size of the 1:00-11:00 vestibule excised. Preoperatively, patient reported mean FSFI pain domain was 0.67, SF-MPQ 16.80, affective 5.15 and PPI 3.42. Mean V-Q prior to surgery was 11.68, mean cotton-tip swab test result for the 12:00 region was 6.15. Conclusions Performing core excision of a very small volume of tissue during surgery in patients with 12:00 pain is associated with an improved PGI-I score in 67% of patients. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is warranted to confirm these findings and optimize the management of vestibulodynia. In patients who fail 12:00 core excision surgery, buccal mucosal grafting of the entire 12:00 vestibule may be a future option. Disclosure No.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».