(030) PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES OF CORE EXCISION FOR SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF NEUROPROLIFERATIVE VESTIBULODYNIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Among patients with neuroproliferative vestibulodynia (NPV) experiencing pain on cotton-tip swab testing at the 1:00-11:00 vestibule prior to complete vestibulectomy surgery, a subset also had pain at the 12:00 vestibule. Excision of the 12:00 core region may be performed concomitantly or after healing from the vestibulectomy. Given that a vaginal flap cannot be advanced to this area, only a core excision is removed and closed using surrounding 12:00 tissue. Differences between the post-operative improvement in the 1:00-11:00 and the 12:00 regions have not been examined to date. To better understand the success of core excision of the 12:00 region, we assessed post-operative patient-reported outcomes specifically of this vestibular region. Objective To characterize patients who underwent 12:00 excision as well as assess Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) specifically regarding 12:00 core excision in individuals with NPV. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients from one clinic who had undergone a 12:00 core excision. Preoperative baseline assessments included Vulvar Pain Functional Questionnaire (V-Q), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), cotton-tip swab test results. Dimensions of the excised tissue as determined by pathology report, responses to the PGI-I scale at > 6 months post-op, and any adverse events were collected. Descriptive statistics were conducted to analyze the PGI-I scores and other outcomes. Results The majority of patients (67%, n=21), with an average age of 26, rated their 12:00 pain as “much improved” or “very much improved” on the PGI-I scale. Mean duration of follow up since surgery was one year and five months, with a minimum follow up of 9 months. Most patients (90%) did not have regrets about having the 12:00 region removed. Most patients (83%) would recommend this surgery to other patients who have 12:00 pain. There were no significant post-operative adverse events with 12:00 excision. Mean dimensions of the excised specimen were 1.01 cm x 0.60 cm x 0.21 cm, 3% of the size of the 1:00-11:00 vestibule excised. Preoperatively, patient reported mean FSFI pain domain was 0.67, SF-MPQ 16.80, affective 5.15 and PPI 3.42. Mean V-Q prior to surgery was 11.68, mean cotton-tip swab test result for the 12:00 region was 6.15. Conclusions Performing core excision of a very small volume of tissue during surgery in patients with 12:00 pain is associated with an improved PGI-I score in 67% of patients. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is warranted to confirm these findings and optimize the management of vestibulodynia. In patients who fail 12:00 core excision surgery, buccal mucosal grafting of the entire 12:00 vestibule may be a future option. Disclosure No.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".